Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 12:17:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 12:16:07 -0500 Received: from dsl254-112-233.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.254.112.233]:24756 "EHLO snark.thyrsus.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 12:14:43 -0500 Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 12:06:12 -0500 From: "Eric S. Raymond" To: Giacomo Catenazzi Cc: David Woodhouse , kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [kbuild-devel] Converting the 2.5 kernel to kbuild 2.5 Message-ID: <20011204120612.B16578@thyrsus.com> Reply-To: esr@thyrsus.com Mail-Followup-To: "Eric S. Raymond" , Giacomo Catenazzi , David Woodhouse , kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1861.1007341572@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> <20011204131136.B6051@caldera.de> <20011204072808.A11867@thyrsus.com> <20011204133932.A8805@caldera.de> <20011204074815.A12231@thyrsus.com> <20011204140050.A10691@caldera.de> <20011204081640.A12658@thyrsus.com> <20011204142958.A14069@caldera.de> <19642.1007484062@redhat.com> <3C0CFF5F.3090404@dplanet.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3C0CFF5F.3090404@dplanet.ch>; from cate@dplanet.ch on Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 05:52:47PM +0100 Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Giacomo Catenazzi : > I don't think esr changed non problematic rules, but one: > all rules without help become automatically dependent to > CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL. I don't like it, but I understand why > he makes this decision. No, it's CONFIG_EXPERT. And this change is not wired in. Comment out this declaration in the top-level rulesfile: condition nohelp on EXPERT and it reverts to old behavior. -- Eric S. Raymond The conclusion is thus inescapable that the history, concept, and wording of the second amendment to the Constitution of the United States, as well as its interpretation by every major commentator and court in the first half-century after its ratification, indicates that what is protected is an individual right of a private citizen to own and carry firearms in a peaceful manner. -- Report of the Subcommittee On The Constitution of the Committee On The Judiciary, United States Senate, 97th Congress, second session (February, 1982), SuDoc# Y4.J 89/2: Ar 5/5 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/