Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759285AbXFPCPn (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jun 2007 22:15:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758147AbXFPCPh (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jun 2007 22:15:37 -0400 Received: from srv1.netkinetics.net ([206.71.148.180]:39869 "EHLO srv1.netkinetics.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757637AbXFPCPg (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jun 2007 22:15:36 -0400 Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 From: Tim Post Reply-To: tim.post@netkinetics.net To: Scott Preece Cc: Alexandre Oliva , Ingo Molnar , Rob Landley , Alan Cox , Daniel Hazelton , Linus Torvalds , Greg KH , debian developer , david@lang.hm, Tarkan Erimer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton In-Reply-To: <7b69d1470706151752x30aeaaacl305d964b0ae4cc2d@mail.gmail.com> References: <466A3EC6.6030706@netone.net.tr> <20070614122031.4751a52b@the-village.bc.nu> <20070614122546.GB22078@elte.hu> <200706141907.11957.rob@landley.net> <20070615120926.GD6269@elte.hu> <7b69d1470706151503v23253546w5648f04673741c8f@mail.gmail.com> <7b69d1470706151752x30aeaaacl305d964b0ae4cc2d@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Net Kinetics Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 10:12:50 +0800 Message-Id: <1181959970.21797.493.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - srv1.netkinetics.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - netkinetics.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 917 Lines: 29 On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 19:52 -0500, Scott Preece wrote: > > Yes, but in highlighting the possibility of evil intentions you > distort the fact that usually there are no such evil intentions... > I don't think you can use "usually" and "fact" together like that. Why is it so bad to account for them since they (do) surface and (could) increase significantly in frequency? For me, the (could) is enough to act upon, regardless of the current likely hood of it happening. Things change frequently. This, unfortunately comes pre-distorted depending on what you believe. All of us are right but we still don't agree. Quite a fluke. That's the problem. Best, --Tim - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/