Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757609AbXFPFv4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Jun 2007 01:51:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752671AbXFPFvs (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Jun 2007 01:51:48 -0400 Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.233]:34594 "EHLO wx-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752318AbXFPFvr (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Jun 2007 01:51:47 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UEs7irKLnovvop+6cPhdSqpit9Dx8P5ZFj3H2IR59bBjQ0ARfMennsyMxRzbhR2eNmgLuxMn9zpyh4KSdq6CeGzcL2yBFB/CgxaaqAWRz2eQJwqawlpWd3IUc22jw0ohGlVrqW2Sb66Cf9tEg7Z/t1dBC7qSFb8pzgzOwiotFbM= Message-ID: <7b69d1470706152251r60a8b060yd757c62b7bfe6e6b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 00:51:46 -0500 From: "Scott Preece" To: tim.post@netkinetics.net Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 Cc: "Alexandre Oliva" , "Ingo Molnar" , "Rob Landley" , "Alan Cox" , "Daniel Hazelton" , "Linus Torvalds" , "Greg KH" , "debian developer" , david@lang.hm, "Tarkan Erimer" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Andrew Morton" In-Reply-To: <1181959970.21797.493.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <466A3EC6.6030706@netone.net.tr> <20070614122031.4751a52b@the-village.bc.nu> <20070614122546.GB22078@elte.hu> <200706141907.11957.rob@landley.net> <20070615120926.GD6269@elte.hu> <7b69d1470706151503v23253546w5648f04673741c8f@mail.gmail.com> <7b69d1470706151752x30aeaaacl305d964b0ae4cc2d@mail.gmail.com> <1181959970.21797.493.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 787 Lines: 22 On 6/15/07, Tim Post wrote: > On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 19:52 -0500, Scott Preece wrote: > > > > > Yes, but in highlighting the possibility of evil intentions you > > distort the fact that usually there are no such evil intentions... > > > > I don't think you can use "usually" and "fact" together like that. Why > is it so bad to account for them since they (do) surface and (could) > increase significantly in frequency? --- I agree that it is possible to have different definitions of "evil" and "ethical"... scott - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/