Received: by 2002:a05:6358:bb9e:b0:b9:5105:a5b4 with SMTP id df30csp1624476rwb; Sat, 3 Sep 2022 21:39:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7FL7erbFhmzJidK8qOFtB4E/TThmaDNmCXkjGB7G6RJ4vczCTNLoxZ6XB3Uau+YCwEL37b X-Received: by 2002:a65:6cc8:0:b0:3fe:2b89:cc00 with SMTP id g8-20020a656cc8000000b003fe2b89cc00mr37363436pgw.599.1662266360471; Sat, 03 Sep 2022 21:39:20 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1662266360; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=PGukaFo3XszzObHortjJIVfpikAB8EUnUJnTufxLDvzinj7pRYUx7KrtrvNAoNjp0C YvjDIvpaY0iM7gi9cPNlNv/6ZQkdJjf9QEflkK9ymVfKWS9PHVfhuw8Qbb0drXMPpG7I uEincs6IJ9rnmqwchiwsGbAv1VIkKfthPOVGj5pSGoCHhrGF4ctLfuB+ih+BuHpqXcAp V5pk6iPtZmrmxZOkPGblXXqxk8YTpCjN15+AUx58Ojme6ywzUcEc+NFe4KGgRRDygu/s 0RarP0V7jFjRfvyr37JDKHAekh/Dd9fF12nYrGN+dxt9jguSSZgkRhSlOWVWiNJ98N8k oDMA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=nFrCU9H+yZfz0Rv5KY1oVWlm8oyUWBoBmZmxLKuuzI4=; b=WUj1nDlrxYxLPHl7rmD80w/CLRwld64wSO8Ik5XiuqMco4i/VcgUAJhETmDgjyR68u sb2c0ZmHPAddEZFDhLONxwQ9OAtZzH7012btbQHpTiwEaGeFSLXa/cEzf8vOJHXigy82 7c/fF3czapGPTZDDMmRzNnYsDX5novueOpjmdUfj4CVAbAHgP8tOExXH3yN3g+eS2X1P VZCwiCBPPpyNtEKoJ6LukBRVLu3utqSVmHW27alHNYjaIu0BzT8tVkKS+YbAK6cLGhVX cjVgAGoZfW4PY8csCPyvrkOOB9DxzGdeWAiKa6p9rXzPbsBJXrfwp7eLo7TLBkKvYtcb aB9Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=Ns1b1DQo; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s15-20020aa78bcf000000b0052e8e81b9afsi6889424pfd.131.2022.09.03.21.39.09; Sat, 03 Sep 2022 21:39:20 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=Ns1b1DQo; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233517AbiIDEVz (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 4 Sep 2022 00:21:55 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51782 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233207AbiIDEVf (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Sep 2022 00:21:35 -0400 Received: from mail-oa1-x41.google.com (mail-oa1-x41.google.com [IPv6:2001:4860:4864:20::41]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 733AB4D80F for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2022 21:21:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oa1-x41.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-11f34610d4aso14517214fac.9 for ; Sat, 03 Sep 2022 21:21:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=nFrCU9H+yZfz0Rv5KY1oVWlm8oyUWBoBmZmxLKuuzI4=; b=Ns1b1DQoXsz5p0SSKmpl63+99/CPj4DT4gOigB3NBTlthJmdqHj+8Q+LmgcNgCZ7KM Zg9de6RI8FeFoRRoZy3kBYLdBXoE7qQ7TnPUaoIkTptEGshkSnbatrMqe6LVi+FdrabS t7RVKaKRtEFUzWPbbnjy0j8hg3BBnPQiiRobqgQIDneAcGKTdPZSmoeqD1jiLt09UsMp TGz8qTwOYNOw48h5+b8OKpAqdQuZv6RiltLW2WvQbNGYPaCGR8JQ7UOGTdLFg4BNNpvP fE+QtFepVeRqVRJ0ABiGtFhRbUdGymZe34hr1mZuL5Lqm9mopMER9qQEkp3TxuCo5H3b CTCw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date; bh=nFrCU9H+yZfz0Rv5KY1oVWlm8oyUWBoBmZmxLKuuzI4=; b=Wab+0TQonsGwZWEPJM5CqN30CoGNzUmunNAgNrOOXD0ZWBeTzqq9g2j6kdMPgjWnuI A+YuZGF/6z7DVqqISDIh90b+Iad+hT369hfsQGUXpG+OOL7fhxAYdN+XKIlmmb7Vfmk8 3TFa3sIEifbghrOesDBQcdHH6yTey97shaSKYQa9FMmoHVkWlWiGVF5ql8TO6TJAbPxW u2tsHYKjiJIsC7bwBKDSBibrN+yYjXgestSjgJ61ALKVboJOGdlXFDndUGYq7zdhYETL RvlDD0N0l02ifsHs8wA1PO9juhyO8xcQEeB53r/ABcuqhahimcFKmdfrXBTU+crIASF/ Dcsw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1I5dgrw3cl4YTp0xOENQH/ZAFEADY2doUV02tgS1mNnIJRdY65 tLXEoyCQDgkhOGhEdN5BiPma8UaL0oI= X-Received: by 2002:a54:4014:0:b0:343:3683:1b60 with SMTP id x20-20020a544014000000b0034336831b60mr4906667oie.203.1662265293494; Sat, 03 Sep 2022 21:21:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sophie (static-198-54-128-109.cust.tzulo.com. [198.54.128.109]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i7-20020a056870890700b0010bf07976c9sm3485476oao.41.2022.09.03.21.21.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 03 Sep 2022 21:21:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Rebecca Mckeever To: Mike Rapoport , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: David Hildenbrand , Rebecca Mckeever Subject: [PATCH v4 4/4] memblock tests: add generic NUMA tests for memblock_alloc_try_nid* Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2022 23:21:08 -0500 Message-Id: <3644b4e2e459bb656dd29bdef0b62291528b2f65.1662264560.git.remckee0@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Add tests for memblock_alloc_try_nid() and memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw() where the simulated physical memory is set up with multiple NUMA nodes. Additionally, two of these tests set nid != NUMA_NO_NODE. All tests are run for both top-down and bottom-up allocation directions. The tested scenarios are: Range unrestricted: - region cannot be allocated: + none of the nodes have enough memory to allocate the region Range restricted: - region can be allocated in the specific node requested without dropping min_addr: + the range fully overlaps with the node, and there are adjacent reserved regions - region cannot be allocated: + nid is set to NUMA_NO_NODE and the total range can fit the region, but the range is split between two nodes and everything else is reserved Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever --- tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_nid_api.c | 197 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 197 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_nid_api.c b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_nid_api.c index 133d77e83e0e..8f25c90c2300 100644 --- a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_nid_api.c +++ b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_nid_api.c @@ -2349,6 +2349,173 @@ static int alloc_try_nid_bottom_up_numa_no_overlap_high_check(void) return 0; } +/* + * A test that tries to allocate a memory region in a specific NUMA node that + * does not have enough memory to allocate a region of the requested size. + * Additionally, none of the nodes have enough memory to allocate the region: + * + * +-----------------------------------+ + * | new | + * +-----------------------------------+ + * |-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------| + * | node0 | node1 | node2 | node3 | node4 | node5 | node6 | node7 | + * +-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+ + * + * Expect no allocation to happen. + */ +static int alloc_try_nid_numa_large_region_generic_check(void) +{ + int nid_req = 3; + void *allocated_ptr = NULL; + phys_addr_t size = MEM_SIZE / SZ_2; + phys_addr_t min_addr; + phys_addr_t max_addr; + + PREFIX_PUSH(); + setup_numa_memblock(node_fractions); + + min_addr = memblock_start_of_DRAM(); + max_addr = memblock_end_of_DRAM(); + + allocated_ptr = run_memblock_alloc_try_nid(size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES, + min_addr, max_addr, nid_req); + ASSERT_EQ(allocated_ptr, NULL); + + test_pass_pop(); + + return 0; +} + +/* + * A test that tries to allocate memory within min_addr and max_addr range when + * there are two reserved regions at the borders. The requested node starts at + * min_addr and ends at max_addr and is the same size as the region to be + * allocated: + * + * min_addr + * | max_addr + * | | + * v v + * | +-----------+-----------------------+-----------------------| + * | | node5 | requested | node7 | + * +------+-----------+-----------------------+-----------------------+ + * + + + * | +----+-----------------------+----+ | + * | | r2 | new | r1 | | + * +-------------+----+-----------------------+----+------------------+ + * + * Expect to merge all of the regions into one. The region counter and total + * size fields get updated. + */ +static int alloc_try_nid_numa_reserved_full_merge_generic_check(void) +{ + int nid_req = 6; + int nid_next = nid_req + 1; + struct memblock_region *new_rgn = &memblock.reserved.regions[0]; + struct memblock_region *req_node = &memblock.memory.regions[nid_req]; + struct memblock_region *next_node = &memblock.memory.regions[nid_next]; + void *allocated_ptr = NULL; + struct region r1, r2; + phys_addr_t size = req_node->size; + phys_addr_t total_size; + phys_addr_t max_addr; + phys_addr_t min_addr; + + PREFIX_PUSH(); + setup_numa_memblock(node_fractions); + + r1.base = next_node->base; + r1.size = SZ_128; + + r2.size = SZ_128; + r2.base = r1.base - (size + r2.size); + + total_size = r1.size + r2.size + size; + min_addr = r2.base + r2.size; + max_addr = r1.base; + + memblock_reserve(r1.base, r1.size); + memblock_reserve(r2.base, r2.size); + + allocated_ptr = run_memblock_alloc_try_nid(size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES, + min_addr, max_addr, nid_req); + + ASSERT_NE(allocated_ptr, NULL); + assert_mem_content(allocated_ptr, size, alloc_nid_test_flags); + + ASSERT_EQ(new_rgn->size, total_size); + ASSERT_EQ(new_rgn->base, r2.base); + + ASSERT_LE(new_rgn->base, req_node->base); + ASSERT_LE(region_end(req_node), region_end(new_rgn)); + + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.cnt, 1); + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.total_size, total_size); + + test_pass_pop(); + + return 0; +} + +/* + * A test that tries to allocate memory within min_addr and max_add range, + * where the total range can fit the region, but it is split between two nodes + * and everything else is reserved. Additionally, nid is set to NUMA_NO_NODE + * instead of requesting a specific node: + * + * +-----------+ + * | new | + * +-----------+ + * | +---------------------+-----------| + * | | prev node | next node | + * +------+---------------------+-----------+ + * + + + * |----------------------+ +-----| + * | r1 | | r2 | + * +----------------------+-----------+-----+ + * ^ ^ + * | | + * | max_addr + * | + * min_addr + * + * Expect no allocation to happen. + */ +static int alloc_try_nid_numa_split_all_reserved_generic_check(void) +{ + void *allocated_ptr = NULL; + struct memblock_region *next_node = &memblock.memory.regions[7]; + struct region r1, r2; + phys_addr_t size = SZ_256; + phys_addr_t max_addr; + phys_addr_t min_addr; + + PREFIX_PUSH(); + setup_numa_memblock(node_fractions); + + r2.base = next_node->base + SZ_128; + r2.size = memblock_end_of_DRAM() - r2.base; + + r1.size = MEM_SIZE - (r2.size + size); + r1.base = memblock_start_of_DRAM(); + + min_addr = r1.base + r1.size; + max_addr = r2.base; + + memblock_reserve(r1.base, r1.size); + memblock_reserve(r2.base, r2.size); + + allocated_ptr = run_memblock_alloc_try_nid(size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES, + min_addr, max_addr, + NUMA_NO_NODE); + + ASSERT_EQ(allocated_ptr, NULL); + + test_pass_pop(); + + return 0; +} + /* Test case wrappers for NUMA tests */ static int alloc_try_nid_numa_simple_check(void) { @@ -2460,6 +2627,33 @@ static int alloc_try_nid_numa_no_overlap_high_check(void) return 0; } +static int alloc_try_nid_numa_large_region_check(void) +{ + test_print("\tRunning %s...\n", __func__); + run_top_down(alloc_try_nid_numa_large_region_generic_check); + run_bottom_up(alloc_try_nid_numa_large_region_generic_check); + + return 0; +} + +static int alloc_try_nid_numa_reserved_full_merge_check(void) +{ + test_print("\tRunning %s...\n", __func__); + run_top_down(alloc_try_nid_numa_reserved_full_merge_generic_check); + run_bottom_up(alloc_try_nid_numa_reserved_full_merge_generic_check); + + return 0; +} + +static int alloc_try_nid_numa_split_all_reserved_check(void) +{ + test_print("\tRunning %s...\n", __func__); + run_top_down(alloc_try_nid_numa_split_all_reserved_generic_check); + run_bottom_up(alloc_try_nid_numa_split_all_reserved_generic_check); + + return 0; +} + int __memblock_alloc_nid_numa_checks(void) { test_print("Running %s NUMA tests...\n", @@ -2476,6 +2670,9 @@ int __memblock_alloc_nid_numa_checks(void) alloc_try_nid_numa_no_overlap_split_check(); alloc_try_nid_numa_no_overlap_low_check(); alloc_try_nid_numa_no_overlap_high_check(); + alloc_try_nid_numa_large_region_check(); + alloc_try_nid_numa_reserved_full_merge_check(); + alloc_try_nid_numa_split_all_reserved_check(); return 0; } -- 2.25.1