Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 12:19:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 12:17:49 -0500 Received: from smtpnotes.altec.com ([209.149.164.10]:17417 "HELO smtpnotes.altec.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 12:17:11 -0500 X-Lotus-FromDomain: ALTEC From: Wayne.Brown@altec.com To: John Stoffel cc: Keith Owens , kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@transmeta.com Message-ID: <86256B18.005EE7DC.00@smtpnotes.altec.com> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 11:11:50 -0600 Subject: Re: [kbuild-devel] Converting the 2.5 kernel to kbuild 2.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org It's not the CML1 language spec that interests me, just the user interface. All I care about is being able to do make menuconfig and make oldconfig, and get the same results as before. What goes on "under the surface" doesn't interest me at all. In fact, here's all I want to know about the whole CML2/kbuild 2.5 issue. Right now I upgrade my kernel like this (simplified slightly): mv .config .. make mrproper mv ../.config . make oldconfig make dep make bzlilo modules modules_install Will I still be able to do it this simply in 2.5.x? (Assuming there's eventually a 2.5.x I can get to compile cleanly. :-) Wayne John Stoffel on 12/04/2001 10:31:10 AM To: Christoph Hellwig cc: Keith Owens , kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@transmeta.com (bcc: Wayne Brown/Corporate/Altec) Subject: Re: [kbuild-devel] Converting the 2.5 kernel to kbuild 2.5 Christoph> I still strongly object to it and I know lots of kernel Christoph> hackers are the same opinion. I'm not a hacker, but I think it's a good thing to move to CML2. I've tested it and it's got some nice features. The Python issue I don't think is too onerous to require of people. And wasn't there someone out there porting CML2 to straight C code? Why are people so wedded to the CML1 language spec anyway? John John Stoffel - Senior Unix Systems Administrator - Lucent Technologies stoffel@lucent.com - http://www.lucent.com - 978-952-7548 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/