Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Tom Fitzhenry <tom@tom-fitzhenry.me.uk>
Cc:     Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>, phone-devel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/1] Add support for the Pine64 PinePhone Pro phone
Date:   Sun,  4 Sep 2022 19:22:21 +0200
Message-Id: <166231195330.2423948.5394487959576836993.b4-ty@sntech.de>
In-Reply-To: <20220829050040.17330-1-tom@tom-fitzhenry.me.uk>
References: <20220829050040.17330-1-tom@tom-fitzhenry.me.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 29 Aug 2022 15:00:39 +1000, Tom Fitzhenry wrote:
> PinePhone Pro is a RK3399 based phone produced by Pine64.
> 
> Add a basic DTS for it. This is a working base that will allow myself and
> others to add more nodes.
> 
> Relies on "dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add PinePhone Pro bindings"[0].
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add initial support for Pine64 PinePhone Pro
      commit: 78a21c7d59520e72ebea667fe8745a4371d9fe86


Why was the dt-binding addition missing?
I've pulled the binding from v3 now.

While it is true that you should not resend patches just to add Acks,
when re-sending a whole series that includes other changes it's still
necessary to keep all patches together ;-)


Best regards,
-- 
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>