Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Sender: Corey Minyard <tcminyard@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 4 Sep 2022 11:40:01 -0500
From:   Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org>
To:     Shaomin Deng <dengshaomin@cdjrlc.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipmi:ipmb: Fix double word in comments
Message-ID: <YxTU4WU3KRco14YL@minyard.net>
Reply-To: minyard@acm.org
References: <20220904160220.30513-1-dengshaomin@cdjrlc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220904160220.30513-1-dengshaomin@cdjrlc.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Sep 04, 2022 at 12:02:20PM -0400, Shaomin Deng wrote:
> Delete the rebundant word "response" in comments.

That's not redundant.  That's a "response to a response".  It would be
easier to read as "response to the response".  I'll fix that and the
other obvious typo there.

-corey

> 
> Signed-off-by: Shaomin Deng <dengshaomin@cdjrlc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ipmb.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ipmb.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ipmb.c
> index 25c010c9ec25..0966e95666ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ipmb.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ipmb.c
> @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ static void ipmi_ipmb_send_response(struct ipmi_ipmb_dev *iidev,
>  	if ((msg->data[0] >> 2) & 1) {
>  		/*
>  		 * It's a response being sent, we needto return a
> -		 * response response.  Fake a send msg command
> +		 * response.  Fake a send msg command
>  		 * response with channel 0.  This will always be ipmb
>  		 * direct.
>  		 */
> -- 
> 2.35.1
>