Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220902131258.3316367-1-cmo@melexis.com> <CAHp75VdOHDHUVhVXj4L-6ZV25mTWTeO3s3EJQVgLxknXHKRUMg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKv63ut0rtTFh3XdF3oR6fxQSLzNkFRS+HPPOY8Xp4LX0OY4Tg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHp75VfJMpf3GeOryt9cH6-tK48BB8ZcfuGxhXovObBanDcc7w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKv63us6OLg8ahdbKvd8c4x9-Ri4aDwNvgc_oov7wZnSBmJGVA@mail.gmail.com> <20220904150346.0c56de9d@jic23-huawei>
In-Reply-To: <20220904150346.0c56de9d@jic23-huawei>
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 4 Sep 2022 22:08:15 +0300
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdMZYD4AwXjoy6dbopUyv4=qwzfgnVpSu_-_ZWtYMG92Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] iio: temperature: mlx90632 Add runtime
 powermanagement modes
To:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc:     Crt Mori <cmo@melexis.com>, linux-iio <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Sep 4, 2022 at 5:37 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Sep 2022 14:05:38 +0200
> Crt Mori <cmo@melexis.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2 Sept 2022 at 20:39, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 8:59 PM Crt Mori <cmo@melexis.com> wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2 Sept 2022 at 17:28, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 4:13 PM <cmo@melexis.com> wrote:

...

> > > > > > +static int __maybe_unused mlx90632_pm_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > > > >
> > > > > No __maybe_unused, use pm_ptr() / pm_sleep_ptr() below.
> > > > >
> > > > Care to explain a bit more about this? I just followed what other
> > > > drivers have...
> > >
> > > And other drivers have what I said, but it's a new feature.
> > > If you run `git log --no-merges --grep 'pm_ptr' -- drivers/iio
> > > include/linux/` and read the history it will explain the case.
> > >
> > Thanks for the hint.
>
> The relevant EXPORT_ for this particular case isn't upstream yet
> We had a proposal on IIO list, but there was a better one as part of
> cleaning this up for MFD.  I haven't checked if there is a suitable
> immutable branch for that patch yet...

Oh, well to know. But in any case pm_ptr() / DEFINE_*PM_OPS can still be used.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko