Received: by 2002:a05:6358:bb9e:b0:b9:5105:a5b4 with SMTP id df30csp2662806rwb; Sun, 4 Sep 2022 22:10:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR5d2X0r2PCj7UpN+SDTufSJ7jPwWBmszw7LWHx4m9RMzhhDcdWl00UKZ1b3204X1h9usKMJ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1b0c:b0:44e:8ae1:8016 with SMTP id by12-20020a0564021b0c00b0044e8ae18016mr2281015edb.342.1662354616405; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 22:10:16 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1662354616; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ybMI1C2/cvchQKPAEapvpsECNz2LFmDfbBrbcYRpnQ6z9+EZ2r7/vPUoJVCfiGORwO 2LIkU5yFYlz5qiIOff0r02PFZxkijkSLpwLJPoZzK+Kazc6bDt4vhJCsfgt80Dafy0ES G3XJKyTzl5NTW0agHof4djlAVgubcf8hH3+9rBUtFJGH7HIx00SVBbw661LljEXrMgHq 2NpkDjqOXG9ymCQJ1lG1so3x048Unr6e6UVyY2QW71IKFzPtL5umX0t0WFi/saJ8LXzy BGQBEjINSR6JzTvmvEgnleX8vyJkzeN5UhLkX3wd9Y12iR7Qu0klI+deoQtMX9hIvzuL vZkA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:cc:references:to :subject; bh=vKenconaivKrg4hL3A1GFiOtkYAQzPEk9woao7qerjI=; b=HGuBkqPItgzS2sv4aZuKA1inDWuW7WP/FPRj0yQbiGLSZE/EHsofRvi16+8VMYZFHN BHrDNC2FoN2Q2/VWbsF1S1ehyvz1pZl7ni9rSFDqI+IEZ89267GA7Wpn1z/Pwt8vhB8W l8lAQU0fFTJ4OtnHDF/mm//jYT43UQeTyzdHj+FrBb0Hl0pc7CiiHwZicw4RHRes6bzF dw0Wer9M39m3fbcOfEx4KkY3t9Y4nX+anMXq9vPR1sGzn2aavi5R5iX2EEDBMcgGpOL8 yN4Dt0tK7C4WM7JRFzZi7dMG67d6LHOHEqss9rcVtAdiIzgGHTjc78+BonOaTkxVX0Xw Crag== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id he30-20020a1709073d9e00b0073d7c6acb76si8620006ejc.540.2022.09.04.22.09.51; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 22:10:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236132AbiIEEev (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 5 Sep 2022 00:34:51 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54244 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231830AbiIEEes (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Sep 2022 00:34:48 -0400 Received: from loongson.cn (mail.loongson.cn [114.242.206.163]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F3A9DE8A; Sun, 4 Sep 2022 21:34:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.130.0.193] (unknown [113.200.148.30]) by localhost.localdomain (Coremail) with SMTP id AQAAf8Bx32tVfBVjyHYRAA--.1094S3; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 12:34:31 +0800 (CST) Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] LoongArch: Add efistub booting support To: Huacai Chen , Ard Biesheuvel References: <20220819102037.2697798-1-chenhuacai@loongson.cn> <9b6f0aeaebbd36882b5b40d655f9ccd20c7be496.camel@xry111.site> Cc: Xi Ruoyao , Huacai Chen , Arnd Bergmann , loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-arch , Xuefeng Li , Guo Ren , Xuerui Wang , Jiaxun Yang , linux-efi , LKML From: Youling Tang Message-ID: <8319b9d4-960c-e706-468a-cb58bef6df8c@loongson.cn> Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2022 12:34:29 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux mips64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CM-TRANSID: AQAAf8Bx32tVfBVjyHYRAA--.1094S3 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxAF1UKw1fur1fArWxWw47CFg_yoWrCrW7pa yxGFW8KF4kJF1xJwn2q3Wj9a4aq34fAr12qrn8tw18Arn0vrnIqr1Iqr45WFyUZrnYkr42 vF42q34xu3Z8ArJanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUU9K14x267AKxVW8JVW5JwAFc2x0x2IEx4CE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0 rVWrJVCq3wAFIxvE14AKwVWUJVWUGwA2ocxC64kIII0Yj41l84x0c7CEw4AK67xGY2AK02 1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r1xM28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r4j 6F4UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_Gr1j6F4UJwA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gc CE3s1le2I262IYc4CY6c8Ij28IcVAaY2xG8wAqx4xG64xvF2IEw4CE5I8CrVC2j2WlYx0E 2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lYx0Ex4A2jsIE14v26r4j6F4UMcvjeVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJV W8JwACjcxG0xvEwIxGrwACjI8F5VA0II8E6IAqYI8I648v4I1lFIxGxcIEc7CjxVA2Y2ka 0xkIwI1lc7I2V7IY0VAS07AlzVAYIcxG8wCY02Avz4vE14v_Gryl42xK82IYc2Ij64vIr4 1l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4xG67AKxVWUJVWUGwC20s026x8GjcxK 67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r1q6r43MIIYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI 8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r4j6F4UMIIF0xvE42xK8VAv wI8IcIk0rVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14 v26r4j6r4UJbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjfU8zuWDUUUU X-CM-SenderInfo: 5wdqw5prxox03j6o00pqjv00gofq/ X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Ard & Huacai On 09/05/2022 11:50 AM, Huacai Chen wrote: > Hi, Ard, > > On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 5:59 AM Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >> >> On Sun, 4 Sept 2022 at 15:24, Huacai Chen wrote: >>> >>> Hi, Ard, >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 6:40 PM Huacai Chen wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, Ard, >>>> >>>> On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 3:14 PM Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, 27 Aug 2022 at 06:41, Xi Ruoyao wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Tested V3 with the magic number check manually removed in my GRUB build. >>>>>> The system boots successfully. I've not tested Arnd's zBoot patch yet. >>>>> >>>>> I am Ard not Arnd :-) >>>>> >>>>> Please use this branch when testing the EFI decompressor: >>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ardb/linux.git/log/?h=efi-decompressor-v4 >>>> The root cause of LoongArch zboot boot failure has been found, it is a >>>> binutils bug, latest toolchain with the below patch can solve the >>>> problem. >>>> >>>> diff --git a/bfd/elfnn-loongarch.c b/bfd/elfnn-loongarch.c >>>> index 5b44901b9e0..fafdc7c7458 100644 >>>> --- a/bfd/elfnn-loongarch.c >>>> +++ b/bfd/elfnn-loongarch.c >>>> @@ -2341,9 +2341,10 @@ loongarch_elf_relocate_section (bfd >>>> *output_bfd, struct bfd_link_info *info, >>>> case R_LARCH_SOP_PUSH_PLT_PCREL: >>>> unresolved_reloc = false; >>>> >>>> - if (resolved_to_const) >>>> + if (!is_undefweak && resolved_to_const) >>>> { >>>> relocation += rel->r_addend; >>>> + relocation -= pc; >>>> break; >>>> } >>>> else if (is_undefweak) >>>> >>>> >>>> Huacai >>> Now the patch is submitted here: >>> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2022-September/122713.html >>> >> >> Great. Given the severity of this bug, I imagine that building the >> LoongArch kernel will require a version of binutils that carries this >> fix. >> >> Therefore, i will revert back to the original approach for accessing >> uncompressed_size, using an extern declaration with an __aligned(1) >> attribute. >> >>> And I have some other questions about kexec: kexec should jump to the >>> elf entry or the pe entry? I think is the elf entry, because if we >>> jump to the pe entry, then SVAM will be executed twice (but it should >>> be executed only once). However, how can we jump to the elf entry if >>> we use zboot? Maybe it is kexec-tool's responsibility to decompress >>> the zboot kernel image? >>> >> >> Yes, very good point. Kexec kernels cannot boot via the EFI entry >> point, as the boot services will already be shutdown. So the kexec >> kernel needs to boot via the same entrypoint in the core kernel that >> the EFI stub calls when it hands over. >> >> For the EFI zboot image in particular, we will need to teach kexec how >> to decompress them. The zboot image has a header that >> a) describes it as a EFI linux zimg >> b) describes the start and end offset of the compressed payload >> c) describes which compression algorithm was used. >> >> This means that any non-EFI loader (including kexec) should be able to >> extract the inner PE/COFF image and decompress it. For arm64 and >> RISC-V, this is sufficient as the EFI and raw images are the same. For >> LoongArch, I suppose it means we need a way to enter the core kernel >> directly via the entrypoint that the EFI stub uses when handing over >> (and pass the original DT argument so the kexec kernel has access to >> the EFI and ACPI firmware tables) > OK, then is this implementation [1] acceptable? I remember that you > said the MS-DOS header shouldn't contain other information, so I guess > this is unacceptable? > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/loongarch/c4dbb14a-5580-1e47-3d15-5d2079e88404@loongson.cn/T/#mb8c1dc44f7fa2d3ef638877f0cd3f958f0be96ad Modifications to the MS-DOS header refer to the arm64 and riscv implementations [1], and to provide the necessary information to kexec-tools[2] when loading uncompressed efi images. [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=0f327f2aaad6a87356cbccfa390d4d3b64d0d3b6 [2] https://github.com/horms/kexec-tools/blob/main/kexec/arch/arm64/image-header.h Thanks, Youling > > Huacai >