Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758691AbXFPPId (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Jun 2007 11:08:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757219AbXFPPIZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Jun 2007 11:08:25 -0400 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.10.15]:58546 "EHLO pat.uio.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756496AbXFPPIY convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Jun 2007 11:08:24 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.6.21.14 NFS related oops From: Trond Myklebust To: Maciej =?UTF-8?Q?So=C5=82tysiak?= Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <93879EA4546642A48E9511F1AD29E031@pysiak> References: <466FDC76.6020207@dns.toxicfilms.tv> <1181762227.6151.55.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <93879EA4546642A48E9511F1AD29E031@pysiak> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 11:08:19 -0400 Message-Id: <1182006499.26143.3.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-UiO-Resend: resent X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-0.1, required=12.0, autolearn=disabled, AWL=-0.088) X-UiO-Scanned: 2EB9370E511EB528FF1B83DD6C50ACF270A63BFC X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: 129.240.10.9 spam_score: 0 maxlevel 200 minaction 2 bait 0 mail/h: 35 total 2406191 max/h 8345 blacklist 0 greylist 0 ratelimit 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2079 Lines: 52 On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 11:26 +0200, Maciej Sołtysiak wrote: > >> ======================= > >> Code: 10 89 5c 24 10 89 c3 89 7c 24 18 89 d7 89 74 24 14 8b 70 28 75 1a > >> 8b > >> 4e 08 89 fa 89 d8 ff 51 18 8b 5c 24 10 83 74 24 14 8b 7c 24 <18> 83 c4 1c > >> c3 > >> 89 74 24 0c 8b 40 10 8b 40 24 8b 40 10 8b 40 08 EIP: [] > >> rpcauth_checkverf+0x34/0x70 [sunrpc] SS:ESP 0068:e64b5eec > > > > At a first guess, it looks as though something has scribbled over your > > credential. Have you tried running this kernel with slab debugging > > enabled? > > I'm running 2.6.21.5 now with slab debugging on, here's what I got about > slab corruption: > > Slab corruption: skbuff_head_cache start=ef287b78, len=164 > Redzone: 0x5a2cf071/0x5a2cf071. > Last user: [](kfree_skbmem+0x3c/0x90) > 090: 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 63 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b > Single bit error detected. Probably bad RAM. > Run memtest86+ or a similar memory test tool. > Prev obj: start=ef287ac8, len=164 > Redzone: 0x170fc2a5/0x170fc2a5. > Last user: [](__alloc_skb+0x2b/0x100) > 000: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 010: 00 00 00 00 e0 71 e6 ef 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > Next obj: start=ef287c28, len=164 > Redzone: 0x170fc2a5/0x170fc2a5. > Last user: [](__alloc_skb+0x2b/0x100) > 000: 84 d0 85 c5 84 d0 85 c5 04 d0 85 c5 2c 0a 73 46 > 010: 6f cd 09 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 08 e5 72 ee > > How probable is that it is really a bad memory issue? > Does this report say anything about which RAM chip I should > investigate/replace ? I have 1x512MB+1x256MB > > Best Regards, > Maciej I'd try doing as suggested above: run memtest86 on the computer for a couple of hours and see what it tells you. That should hopefully give you enough information to figure out which chips need replacing. Cheers Trond - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/