Received: by 2002:a05:6358:bb9e:b0:b9:5105:a5b4 with SMTP id df30csp2960542rwb; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 04:28:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4j1rE3uMJPqnEvpIv0JmS8oBbEbbh4JS7FU4+H79SyCYW4JRvg6UpWEgqEKCw3viOQNJhJ X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:cc4c:b0:741:3f8b:1d19 with SMTP id mm12-20020a170906cc4c00b007413f8b1d19mr30200416ejb.72.1662377294031; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 04:28:14 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1662377294; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=PjK/VPxazKsI3nPrnteGtbQ1z9Ldrx2qIF3aHhREgyHXem0NlGZMnbNV29qTL6giYp RybtLDatCWWKdmH0Rt9zKovwaLFes5ClK6lhvYn3FKFJSXAFUXwb7DKZVmpLhrOpRcUP RK1PTNrRV51e3bDxYC4Oda3LUn41wjVDvJlFbYJBJaFR76kgfW5djJ1/rVh47L7hmPFH C922MZ2vnx2RH+6lX5kc46WIPXMS7/pKEFi/aOJRh2UzyB2dv9cMmEig4yw1UDZ7ZbYH AWULrgwbpLXJrMRXgnBwHwX8js4aCEoWX7KrW4NWFD0Q4O9I3Wrgd+syJm04UVKJr/Al ouiQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to:references:cc:to:subject:from :date:dkim-signature; bh=GBTY4FYcuHfI5ueJVBWzYH7Pdxgm9BwW83RFqwxuwTM=; b=Kr6QYNtat0nBClTojTvL95EwRESgM98kYZwsWTYD5DTYHJwuU1a8Y41UTAP1jE+ZOt WAC+Hupu95YNgCtMHNcMOMxtz6aRUH3Xk5DkS6LTL5BXMu0Qeu1R+WzTkTBhAoXLPTT7 15BJBTzwhy16xCJRT53VI7FbE/Jsp2vi2XITzJQ8bY72rMuYRy3TuwFd9Eyh0JllC4+0 5hfI/H4t1sMXwcPbfj4oagwgZWMZwGqeGfOKo8x2PVCxB9Wm3Qvisbx2W//xqMnSV92k FtdMpNeg5Z6kJYPK752RxvJj0178ssf/7DG9rjctCQMEgr5VQDChDs7cTzX0FMYEziMi Uwiw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b="B/aniOiv"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e22-20020a17090658d600b00760296e633esi5336626ejs.673.2022.09.05.04.27.48; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 04:28:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b="B/aniOiv"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236405AbiIEKjb (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 5 Sep 2022 06:39:31 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38644 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235960AbiIEKj3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Sep 2022 06:39:29 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 901CF13DCD for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 03:39:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 2858uIq9028977; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 10:38:02 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=date : from : subject : to : cc : references : in-reply-to : message-id : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=pp1; bh=GBTY4FYcuHfI5ueJVBWzYH7Pdxgm9BwW83RFqwxuwTM=; b=B/aniOivLHgu+Gt43dEPhqyrNK0eExt7f+Bfswv7tYF09LJWiSI6ocEq5taoGZfyZW2X CC2CscMXFaLppEALKf4Ctqt4miTp34L7nuTqD1usNYW6fQEpU8JX6TVafBUaxuxUHQYK pSy+pKnu+gmkV/cNFuC66g9qzHyCk6vm0+Z8c3KX6JKjbVnWzDnE4/CLpKycH9cOy0i3 +0xwFi3IBAj5IeQUmr8HqRW5vlQcF9qgoHcHyebc6aji/G4EagT8i6ZuLq8CCxcAMPp5 /Z75U2SYHWsIy6Sf5ypUTtVW4dVKcDICEbpRQQGPa1yRgYQATK7Cju7yoIA/jqqi+k/r mw== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3jde1sb5dg-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 05 Sep 2022 10:38:02 +0000 Received: from m0098417.ppops.net (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 2859pIaZ026973; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 10:38:02 GMT Received: from ppma01fra.de.ibm.com (46.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.70]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3jde1sb5c2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 05 Sep 2022 10:38:01 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma01fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma01fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 285Aa3Ma030440; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 10:38:00 GMT Received: from b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.192]) by ppma01fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3jbxj8spn4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 05 Sep 2022 10:37:59 +0000 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 285AYVtT38601170 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 5 Sep 2022 10:34:31 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A7A0A405B; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 10:37:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5AEBA4059; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 10:37:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (unknown [9.43.114.209]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 10:37:56 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2022 16:07:55 +0530 From: "Naveen N. Rao" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 15/16] objtool/powerpc: Enable objtool to be built on ppc To: Christophe Leroy , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , Sathvika Vasireddy Cc: "aik@ozlabs.ru" , "chenzhongjin@huawei.com" , "Elliott, Robert (Servers)" , "jpoimboe@redhat.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "mbenes@suse.cz" , "mingo@redhat.com" , "mpe@ellerman.id.au" , "npiggin@gmail.com" , "peterz@infradead.org" , "rostedt@goodmis.org" References: <20220829055223.24767-1-sv@linux.ibm.com> <20220829055223.24767-16-sv@linux.ibm.com> <33924523-5437-eb9a-116a-8e249ce99bd2@csgroup.eu> In-Reply-To: <33924523-5437-eb9a-116a-8e249ce99bd2@csgroup.eu> User-Agent: astroid/4d6b06ad (https://github.com/astroidmail/astroid) Message-Id: <1662373828.xrnduc1uco.naveen@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: jgjlZb4ObY8iiB9fAnBgAt3jhZYYSwtD X-Proofpoint-GUID: iF1ZGt_6bnuxfTVL8qnCUkP4fSCCh0Tv Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Proofpoint-UnRewURL: 0 URL was un-rewritten MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.895,Hydra:6.0.517,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-09-05_07,2022-09-05_02,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=939 adultscore=0 clxscore=1011 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2207270000 definitions=main-2209050051 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christophe Leroy wrote: >=20 >=20 > Le 29/08/2022 =C3=A0 07:52, Sathvika Vasireddy a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0: >>=20 >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig >> index 4c466acdc70d..dc05cd23c233 100644 >> --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig >> @@ -237,6 +237,7 @@ config PPC >> select HAVE_MOD_ARCH_SPECIFIC >> select HAVE_NMI if PERF_EVENTS || (PPC64 && PPC_BOOK3S) >> select HAVE_OPTPROBES >> + select HAVE_OBJTOOL if PPC32 || MPROFILE_KERNEL >=20 > Why restrict it to MPROFILE_KERNEL ? In your RFC it was for all PPC64. >=20 > Recent discussion on the list shows new problem with recordmcount, see=20 > https://lore.kernel.org/all/MW5PR84MB184250EA1CAE04497C1E7CE9AB769@MW5PR8= 4MB1842.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM/ >=20 > Those ones are with ppc64 big endian, so objtool would be welcome here=20 > as well. I don't think adding support for objtool on ppc64 elfv1 is a good idea.=20 While it might solve the immediate issue with recordmcount, I worry that=20 the function descriptors and dot symbols in ppc64 elfv1 might throw up=20 issues in the future causing maintenance overhead. - Naveen