Received: by 2002:a05:6358:bb9e:b0:b9:5105:a5b4 with SMTP id df30csp2987138rwb; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 04:56:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6HJlrQ0ovkMAqY2y4151lmaXvPohE7HvroRa7CMfyY3gdRqhj4xgXs6aUhQEYJrWS+KvEM X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7004:b0:176:9fa2:48df with SMTP id y4-20020a170902700400b001769fa248dfmr7191418plk.31.1662378994345; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 04:56:34 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1662378994; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=khm1B1QU5GDP/+bmiUZthC/pjdov10le7ad2Us7aRsM9RHJ5WB3TURjXxnTob5cd7T DzjCiVmgWQFdQsaSaS9sB25z75mnuUNUqecklU3eTmo+qROGdHZzQX+HP/lEgJwm8YsA /ubdpShms6+TEV7GD3eLo9P+20Y+Ec4078Fu0beaBRfFSi9bkaOnjvvArvUV/E3HNdW5 +KXTQZlRZGG4aIs0uplBlBkTfScq573vOj01Y7hUqpdeCJ4CjPogBPFw8NuUqkF6Y/u6 fiMFakP04KhOTA9O/Hg545/3eEgam3fJH0Jwd9r1kLPdqtCzhMoaZ/oljc9MDy6pAw8k Telw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=Rl4tOVlSUyrdcyJwjIs8IDtNlSuTwsFZQUMLJSXIaqI=; b=kCDX/BVJWjd/+uUe9X3zLTXau4fmkoqoXbzjNDdsAoxOQx1izxLr3Sup0T6nWTug97 irhQdZOSdge+mV6U9KCrh4//8AQWnO6F/Ecq+MQF0dxR31InGns94/mHGaKfxzQAq9y+ yJk+cZgdzNz+mf50wm2VmuzIM61nsbTxeuPf5L9iLKKL1iUo2SYK5RjYnKKtAhXBrVVj XdOnc1hXea6XlRlOrgctLLxNgkHM9U6zIuXqzhMm6lbgRvODTbqGQc+S0gaL/lRBjRl6 wXDPxc6dhfqvtSxawZDoZkmQ6zgPz0XSROUy26fHTCp0O3CNyAb8CO4wUaORbt6qcYu/ lRyw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h8-20020a17090a710800b001f4f9ff5347si1271876pjk.81.2022.09.05.04.56.22; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 04:56:34 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237621AbiIEK2t (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 5 Sep 2022 06:28:49 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51028 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237632AbiIEK2j (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Sep 2022 06:28:39 -0400 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EB4C114E; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 03:28:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from canpemm500002.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.53]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4MLl6N5vkTznV2y; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 18:26:04 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.124.27) by canpemm500002.china.huawei.com (7.192.104.244) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 18:28:36 +0800 From: Miaohe Lin To: CC: , , Subject: [PATCH] block: remove unneeded return value of bio_check_ro() Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2022 18:27:54 +0800 Message-ID: <20220905102754.1942-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.23.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Originating-IP: [10.175.124.27] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.179) To canpemm500002.china.huawei.com (7.192.104.244) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org bio_check_ro() always return false now. Remove this unneeded return value and cleanup the sole caller. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin --- block/blk-core.c | 10 +++------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c index a0d1104c5590..fe6b27e3a513 100644 --- a/block/blk-core.c +++ b/block/blk-core.c @@ -487,18 +487,15 @@ static int __init fail_make_request_debugfs(void) late_initcall(fail_make_request_debugfs); #endif /* CONFIG_FAIL_MAKE_REQUEST */ -static inline bool bio_check_ro(struct bio *bio) +static inline void bio_check_ro(struct bio *bio) { if (op_is_write(bio_op(bio)) && bdev_read_only(bio->bi_bdev)) { if (op_is_flush(bio->bi_opf) && !bio_sectors(bio)) - return false; + return; pr_warn("Trying to write to read-only block-device %pg\n", bio->bi_bdev); /* Older lvm-tools actually trigger this */ - return false; } - - return false; } static noinline int should_fail_bio(struct bio *bio) @@ -722,8 +719,7 @@ void submit_bio_noacct(struct bio *bio) if (should_fail_bio(bio)) goto end_io; - if (unlikely(bio_check_ro(bio))) - goto end_io; + bio_check_ro(bio); if (!bio_flagged(bio, BIO_REMAPPED)) { if (unlikely(bio_check_eod(bio))) goto end_io; -- 2.23.0