Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>,
        alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Cc:     andy@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org, hdegoede@redhat.com,
        andy.shevchenko@gmail.com, perex@perex.cz,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tiwai@suse.com,
        kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com, amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com,
        yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com, intel-poland@eclists.intel.com,
        ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com, peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com,
        lgirdwood@gmail.com, pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com
In-Reply-To: <20220904102840.862395-1-cezary.rojewski@intel.com>
References: <20220904102840.862395-1-cezary.rojewski@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] lib/string_helpers: Introduce parse_int_array_user()
Message-Id: <166239300589.745322.7930709481816524867.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 05 Sep 2022 16:50:05 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, 4 Sep 2022 12:28:38 +0200, Cezary Rojewski wrote:
> Continuation of recent upstream discussion [1] regarding user string
> tokenization.
> 
> First, parse_int_array_user() is introduced to allow for splitting
> specified user string into a sequence of integers. Makes use of
> get_options() internally so the parsing logic is not duplicated.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/2] lib/string_helpers: Introduce parse_int_array_user()
      commit: d2a411f810a0db055f02cc18e5cfa833bb2c9ccc
[2/2] ASoC: SOF: Remove strsplit_u32() and tokenize_input()
      commit: b9163e9b5f14d690752010ee843b2d788c3536f1

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark