Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220903-gpiod_get_from_of_node-remove-v1-0-b29adfb27a6c@gmail.com>
 <20220903-gpiod_get_from_of_node-remove-v1-4-b29adfb27a6c@gmail.com>
 <CAHp75VdMr7wru-2hD1HH3OS5JTNdzt6VRqB6OFoCp2JkiuiTjw@mail.gmail.com>
 <YxZQj8bwJCx5rqDv@google.com> <CAHp75VdHJS4YgrTK15OuY5sxodxKObUtzturL+YPXFQ3_wpxig@mail.gmail.com>
 <YxZTS3Nl1YaMGoBC@google.com>
In-Reply-To: <YxZTS3Nl1YaMGoBC@google.com>
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 5 Sep 2022 22:55:30 +0300
Message-ID: <CAHp75VeNajcf-Y6xvDDVwZijg6U53ggg1HQox1AZ74=wRut+1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 04/11] usb: phy: tegra: switch to using devm_gpiod_get()
To:     Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
        Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Krzysztof_Wilczy=C5=84ski?= <kw@linux.com>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
        Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Pali_Roh=C3=A1r?= <pali@kernel.org>,
        LINUXWATCHDOG <linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>,
        USB <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-tegra <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:MEMORY TECHNOLOGY..." <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 10:51 PM Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 10:41:40PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 10:40 PM Dmitry Torokhov
> > <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 01:59:44PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 9:32 AM Dmitry Torokhov
> > > > <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:

...

> > > > > -               gpiod = devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node(&pdev->dev, np,
> > > > > -                                                   "nvidia,phy-reset-gpio",
> > > > > -                                                   0, GPIOD_OUT_HIGH,
> > > > > -                                                   "ulpi_phy_reset_b");
> > > > > +               gpiod = devm_gpiod_get(&pdev->dev, "nvidia,phy-reset",
> > > > > +                                      GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
> > > > >                 err = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(gpiod);
> > > >
> > > > What does _OR_ZERO mean now?
> > >
> > > This converts a pointer to an error code if a pointer represents
> > > ERR_PTR() encoded error, or 0 to indicate success.
> >
> > Yes, I know that. My point is, how is it useful now (or even before)?
> > I mean that devm_gpio_get() never returns NULL, right?
>
> What does returning NULL have to do with anything.

It has to do with a dead code. If defm_gpiod_get() does not return
NULL, then why do we even bother to check?

> It converts a pointer
> to a "classic" return code, with negative errors and 0 on success.
>
> It allows to not use multiple IS_ERR/PTR_ERR in the code (I'd need 1
> IS_ERR and 2 PTR_ERR, one in dev_err() and another to return).

I don't see how this is relevant.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko