Received: by 2002:a05:6358:bb9e:b0:b9:5105:a5b4 with SMTP id df30csp3611644rwb; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 15:16:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7Wj7fG35dZ6KjV8Hw3tE5XkTCj+rPEMy/QD7jsEoEHfTKeWTYogxtvlWkgZASeHXbT1bqg X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:846f:b0:741:3edd:94f5 with SMTP id hx15-20020a170906846f00b007413edd94f5mr31960882ejc.221.1662416212846; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 15:16:52 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1662416212; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ES+e2ooM3VGwGLEsWWe0LhFjNwD8S+gZaGzTAJ5h/JAdaveumaHN1sXb60JtMvQxkM 4PUKlTd7FcowAeioJwq09AVh/YjydGtFUJjda6ifTAW9b8Z+UMdoFQev5FbwFzrykFBZ S8lBZmRzu30BMU4FPlK1CTqYMBIlzMjM1gphiBlDha1trSNgn0TSnFcgA3BvOHuo0qzO PEuWxhr9c4TfafBeZRlHLEFPANoSwySGwDeW3UWUA2jXtdzo6z4uezC4IxyOemRXnRvr 20tUXNVUUFmIdRY118teB8MN+hLCwSgNmwpVPDgyWWxK8ZD2TeMHAQVjT3EcBtmFM53u 82OQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=NycFywALOql0/ca0A4x2CHoaBZkltjZTIH9JQYcZImU=; b=oi0PnHLLSBirn4qqKd0Gmit7e49veghZ10GGhIc2ioRkXvJYGleqqEJCWGQ4W+0sB4 oAB/9A0nAECuhAqodt7985Y3Sj89aS5QN1ukWjwxBXIM6AsejioP9cR+kuWN5GQUFe45 MyLTOqxDSuSHZGnyWy8PNCDtqlG11ESwllrp03BPC+hQtw5ncr6M6kf6x+fEOIKbV/mu gH+djWL4QzMByCF4hkLOCNQAwGk1moR+BZONdsPURMoMg3AExXbIwzak3vwElKQNOCQq flIS7wGEl9X5am0TzRBh8WdPAGaPv7BAl31qAlRY7PTvjWXu4eZoUkiqo0TwT9U4haWG Cgtg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=UEJHEKUd; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e16-20020a17090658d000b0073d92cad668si980913ejs.664.2022.09.05.15.16.27; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 15:16:52 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=UEJHEKUd; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231527AbiIEWA3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 5 Sep 2022 18:00:29 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48264 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231958AbiIEWAW (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Sep 2022 18:00:22 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBC8B25EBD for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 15:00:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1662415213; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=NycFywALOql0/ca0A4x2CHoaBZkltjZTIH9JQYcZImU=; b=UEJHEKUdW7vTbdtuAcpc2P8lmGsUXXwipakUiu2/Oi0PK7ye4RKjZ9ZW+Ehk/cmaAdnSUb O2VDSSPitDl81Ehmzu2EsVOU8wj6VgF2boLYSRQvpfvNHLmQvRzkuS+3pA5SlgI36nWU9N IdldSKTVBUX2Nu/o2mL0S6euAlmg8uM= Received: from mail-ej1-f69.google.com (mail-ej1-f69.google.com [209.85.218.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id us-mta-121-ERfc_yUGPhyr27JdwhlALA-1; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 18:00:12 -0400 X-MC-Unique: ERfc_yUGPhyr27JdwhlALA-1 Received: by mail-ej1-f69.google.com with SMTP id hs4-20020a1709073e8400b0073d66965277so2611882ejc.6 for ; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 15:00:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=NycFywALOql0/ca0A4x2CHoaBZkltjZTIH9JQYcZImU=; b=xB3p3J2zh37P4/4SW1FzQyUa/wXyN4+DsC1u+8n2gjkc95ox2py9HnsW1z9e4UYdtP AUKGvC2ew0c55w/r/eJpNvMYKtcfL7kLqUXRZJC39etAcXA27WMvkDE3pIWWkE6vUNsn THl1ZPeIyN1TQ3awCYzSa6494cWWFFBgn/bMUh1ixA6Tx6pGs+pkpBji+p9LFaoQMffh hdTcYmsAN++hb2kOH4CDhu/hTuQuP06bRmyjjPf3ZS7y1JDPFU0iRqTsf85pxpS9jTrd 6VcMUfFpiei9MHmiTaoIkpSfxwuaFb1rjKqwm9fzT6XCZ7xmwID5IVR8OxUpN4OX++pD tibw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1RTgbIXavR2p4qGEsrA2tE2+Hqc8qaz99LubhBh6CPYbGgvgNm xrMksj/Fxo3dcpHOyLt4iSX+YijleTPw5bGXL9gRbqPV6ctU05eJ7KblIukj38/YqepiEPN17Z7 xa4XLMZQsJgZZf/MG/x2Fp498 X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7208:b0:73d:7097:ac6f with SMTP id dr8-20020a170907720800b0073d7097ac6fmr38643639ejc.388.1662415211703; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 15:00:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7208:b0:73d:7097:ac6f with SMTP id dr8-20020a170907720800b0073d7097ac6fmr38643619ejc.388.1662415211492; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 15:00:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2001:b07:6468:f312:e3ec:5559:7c5c:1928? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:e3ec:5559:7c5c:1928]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id q3-20020a17090676c300b007030c97ae62sm5550526ejn.191.2022.09.05.15.00.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 05 Sep 2022 15:00:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2022 23:59:52 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/23] KVM: SVM: Process ICR on AVIC IPI delivery failure due to invalid target Content-Language: en-US To: Sean Christopherson Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Suravee Suthikulpanit , Maxim Levitsky , Li RongQing References: <20220903002254.2411750-1-seanjc@google.com> <20220903002254.2411750-4-seanjc@google.com> From: Paolo Bonzini In-Reply-To: <20220903002254.2411750-4-seanjc@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 9/3/22 02:22, Sean Christopherson wrote: > Emulate ICR writes on AVIC IPI failures due to invalid targets using the > same logic as failures due to invalid types. AVIC acceleration fails if > _any_ of the targets are invalid, and crucially VM-Exits before sending > IPIs to targets that _are_ valid. In logical mode, the destination is a > bitmap, i.e. a single IPI can target multiple logical IDs. Doing nothing > causes KVM to drop IPIs if at least one target is valid and at least one > target is invalid. > > Fixes: 18f40c53e10f ("svm: Add VMEXIT handlers for AVIC") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson > Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky > --- > arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c | 16 +++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c > index 4fbef2af1efc..6a3d225eb02c 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c > @@ -502,14 +502,18 @@ int avic_incomplete_ipi_interception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > trace_kvm_avic_incomplete_ipi(vcpu->vcpu_id, icrh, icrl, id, index); > > switch (id) { > + case AVIC_IPI_FAILURE_INVALID_TARGET: > case AVIC_IPI_FAILURE_INVALID_INT_TYPE: > /* > * Emulate IPIs that are not handled by AVIC hardware, which > - * only virtualizes Fixed, Edge-Triggered INTRs. The exit is > - * a trap, e.g. ICR holds the correct value and RIP has been > - * advanced, KVM is responsible only for emulating the IPI. > - * Sadly, hardware may sometimes leave the BUSY flag set, in > - * which case KVM needs to emulate the ICR write as well in > + * only virtualizes Fixed, Edge-Triggered INTRs, and falls over > + * if _any_ targets are invalid, e.g. if the logical mode mask > + * is a superset of running vCPUs. > + * > + * The exit is a trap, e.g. ICR holds the correct value and RIP > + * has been advanced, KVM is responsible only for emulating the > + * IPI. Sadly, hardware may sometimes leave the BUSY flag set, > + * in which case KVM needs to emulate the ICR write as well in > * order to clear the BUSY flag. > */ > if (icrl & APIC_ICR_BUSY) > @@ -525,8 +529,6 @@ int avic_incomplete_ipi_interception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > */ > avic_kick_target_vcpus(vcpu->kvm, apic, icrl, icrh, index); > break; > - case AVIC_IPI_FAILURE_INVALID_TARGET: > - break; > case AVIC_IPI_FAILURE_INVALID_BACKING_PAGE: > WARN_ONCE(1, "Invalid backing page\n"); > break; Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini