Received: by 2002:a05:6358:bb9e:b0:b9:5105:a5b4 with SMTP id df30csp3814061rwb; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 19:57:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6c5qUC1UzB75rwAV/SaX7BgibxZzKEomjECLXdZDJaBQ04IaSZ1Yl/wGO9Mp7jJAaCoJTK X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2bf9:b0:73d:dd00:9ce8 with SMTP id gv57-20020a1709072bf900b0073ddd009ce8mr35593803ejc.151.1662433035852; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 19:57:15 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1662433035; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ry6ih9kTC/4uLqEK/bN+UBtMiyZzugg33F+91NEpsIv1fLR4f+nHrfs78zXDRCtLJu TIonLevEsmvfOy1rwQi57WarDNgj0VAwGQRIye7zrbYiLIOHRK2koSqnJEQeT6s622Xk crXsrTUOMszyZOgpcvh7HcIZm+0SRloCuIKY3ksi3Or09g6/C/2nvb0A2a3PeHKr2key cCfYB0uh7aY6l/Ah3kAsN9ugUFLfDrF70Fo0FZR2h5UqWojGox9igRs+62IKt1WM1wPV i0/wPxCU2Q4KvJF3Y0unT3wVcgNq27q8PsTekzIZnXNoL8YtD89XnFCta9xXVYUJaO1B 9llg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=4qDNF8dPhMwbDSHgKTnXc7ZrRTg2DhtHWLkSBAhsVwg=; b=I5k0hH88RuzwOXwHcQJNCN8WQ/Lv37rV17HX13D97xnmnKoQI3zz9kcA0ONtZhEexl BSqtupLpY+GjEFfSAve88xZebxSPJisjOKTPVqpXd9bpEa/oNfShjh5PP1baiCJVpM/4 CdVOH8lqotXQ+67aUhwA+Eo9OYAFDiwFz5A6a1jAvZJEwwCkJ+PIwoIKg6wq4u0Rgv8u XbwwRilahCQsqxVUg6ItL4HbcQj9eQQNHL5K5bGxYuTiK1qg7nYUbreIqJf6pX2lj7or hGsQBgSRmvqPcJGCEAeaz/z+P0+3yMdkQKeLtJkEvaS79w+veFsvyyebXEzwZHu5VMDT klbQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=Vua1s6fm; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g9-20020a056402090900b00442296a8407si9422221edz.629.2022.09.05.19.56.51; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 19:57:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=Vua1s6fm; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232754AbiIFCdE (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 5 Sep 2022 22:33:04 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43698 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229546AbiIFCdC (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Sep 2022 22:33:02 -0400 Received: from mail-il1-x142.google.com (mail-il1-x142.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::142]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5368C255B9; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 19:33:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-il1-x142.google.com with SMTP id e7so5339005ilc.5; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 19:33:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=4qDNF8dPhMwbDSHgKTnXc7ZrRTg2DhtHWLkSBAhsVwg=; b=Vua1s6fm20ZKL/f8WgybLoA/y7enupNXOWshqQCGGsvq+XBEusMdJNVTI+cqVMT96N CsE0++wzyFpJNReS81/SPKo66yJxQJyoGN6NBLClMnVTBo4uaz1nVZ1kML/h+8TJy7pA 3Me0UvTqeaSVZP/f9ggOwAbseA1dGGiT1Hhi2+adXCkHPy2g8N/YGDeaJENR8tzCM/rV 1zm1znSgFI9RcOZIm4LZrk13BPO4fbynuFgNmePzSyLBaZvNYgus1M07sge5BzHW/XLJ P2Vwgun8ufixAdU7ip1g2bYKGLutSzwohuvcrZYghumJaHCCUggGGdVw+1LsCEs5Atxy xo8Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=4qDNF8dPhMwbDSHgKTnXc7ZrRTg2DhtHWLkSBAhsVwg=; b=io9ZDYKWMaPjblEsOnNEx3pI2tRF/HFMRF1Gn3zdf8sQX+l+8cBPSChk8xjYcVOgJr S/o5UjVdDLcI8GdBwwDHoG91Xv435D7yagBy+uX4v/lDmv9Zwg9JQ/AzqwY/0XsGYTFo 30qWoj+kJjgc5u6XoXPeakA0FxVS2sl2M8FuJCQ0q8enFmEYq5E8vUYiwS/GeW2yfhA8 yHGkA9Wdz+ci/DmN7wZYTko5YFvmBnWnccxrVv9RbPhnE5soHl4gQWP3zjAYvOODKzqx QWaft4Hr6wI2irTcaVCTCHVMdQnaTDggsqyJDW1lajs5Jf4Idh6AeUTlk0+WmP/aUytM ql9Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo0ukoqlwJE7dwi5Z2wWi+uk5TCPClzypXEQ5FviUN6gxlXnecnu L8FfNE9ZDndgSAjns5bhs49X3XJhwP5sVdahwOI= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:190a:b0:2ee:9e75:ae4b with SMTP id w10-20020a056e02190a00b002ee9e75ae4bmr9141148ilu.219.1662431580497; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 19:33:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220905143318.1592015-1-roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com> <20220905143318.1592015-3-roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com> In-Reply-To: <20220905143318.1592015-3-roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com> From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2022 04:32:24 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 02/12] bpf: Move dynptr type check to is_dynptr_type_expected() To: Roberto Sassu Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yhs@fb.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com, haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, mykolal@fb.com, dhowells@redhat.com, jarkko@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, mingo@redhat.com, paul@paul-moore.com, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, shuah@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, deso@posteo.net, Roberto Sassu , Joanne Koong Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 5 Sept 2022 at 16:34, Roberto Sassu wrote: > > From: Roberto Sassu > > Move dynptr type check to is_dynptr_type_expected() from > is_dynptr_reg_valid_init(), so that callers can better determine the cause > of a negative result (dynamic pointer not valid/initialized, dynamic > pointer of the wrong type). It will be useful for example for BTF, to > restrict which dynamic pointer types can be passed to kfuncs, as initially > only the local type will be supported. > > Also, splitting makes the code more readable, since checking the dynamic > pointer type is not necessarily related to validity and initialization. > > Split the validity/initialization and dynamic pointer type check also in > the verifier, and adjust the expected error message in the test (a test for > an unexpected dynptr type passed to a helper cannot be added due to missing > suitable helpers, but this case has been tested manually). > > Cc: Joanne Koong > Cc: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi > Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu > --- I'm not sure the split is _really_ needed, but I don't feel strongly about it and defer to Joanne and others. Otherwise, Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi > kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 35 ++++++++++++++----- > .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dynptr.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c > index 068b20ed34d2..10b3c0a81d09 100644 > --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c > +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c > @@ -779,8 +779,8 @@ static bool is_dynptr_reg_valid_uninit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_ > return true; > } > > -static bool is_dynptr_reg_valid_init(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg, > - enum bpf_arg_type arg_type) > +static bool is_dynptr_reg_valid_init(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, > + struct bpf_reg_state *reg) > { > struct bpf_func_state *state = func(env, reg); > int spi = get_spi(reg->off); > @@ -796,11 +796,24 @@ static bool is_dynptr_reg_valid_init(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_re > return false; > } > > + return true; > +} > + > +static bool is_dynptr_type_expected(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, > + struct bpf_reg_state *reg, > + enum bpf_arg_type arg_type) > +{ > + struct bpf_func_state *state = func(env, reg); > + enum bpf_dynptr_type dynptr_type; > + int spi = get_spi(reg->off); > + > /* ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR takes any type of dynptr */ > if (arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR) > return true; > > - return state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.dynptr.type == arg_to_dynptr_type(arg_type); > + dynptr_type = arg_to_dynptr_type(arg_type); > + > + return state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.dynptr.type == dynptr_type; > } > > /* The reg state of a pointer or a bounded scalar was saved when > @@ -6050,21 +6063,27 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 arg, > } > > meta->uninit_dynptr_regno = regno; > - } else if (!is_dynptr_reg_valid_init(env, reg, arg_type)) { > + } else if (!is_dynptr_reg_valid_init(env, reg)) { > + verbose(env, > + "Expected an initialized dynptr as arg #%d\n", > + arg + 1); > + return -EINVAL; > + } else if (!is_dynptr_type_expected(env, reg, arg_type)) { > const char *err_extra = ""; > > switch (arg_type & DYNPTR_TYPE_FLAG_MASK) { > case DYNPTR_TYPE_LOCAL: > - err_extra = "local "; > + err_extra = "local"; > break; > case DYNPTR_TYPE_RINGBUF: > - err_extra = "ringbuf "; > + err_extra = "ringbuf"; > break; > default: > + err_extra = ""; > break; > } > - > - verbose(env, "Expected an initialized %sdynptr as arg #%d\n", > + verbose(env, > + "Expected a dynptr of type %s as arg #%d\n", > err_extra, arg + 1); > return -EINVAL; > } > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dynptr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dynptr.c > index bcf80b9f7c27..8fc4e6c02bfd 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dynptr.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dynptr.c > @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ static struct { > {"invalid_helper2", "Expected an initialized dynptr as arg #3"}, > {"invalid_write1", "Expected an initialized dynptr as arg #1"}, > {"invalid_write2", "Expected an initialized dynptr as arg #3"}, > - {"invalid_write3", "Expected an initialized ringbuf dynptr as arg #1"}, > + {"invalid_write3", "Expected an initialized dynptr as arg #1"}, > {"invalid_write4", "arg 1 is an unacquired reference"}, > {"invalid_read1", "invalid read from stack"}, > {"invalid_read2", "cannot pass in dynptr at an offset"}, > -- > 2.25.1 >