Received: by 2002:a05:6358:bb9e:b0:b9:5105:a5b4 with SMTP id df30csp3836259rwb; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 20:29:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6em41kVk+1d/Mz8szmfuyQjmQwOA4Mvw+VUb/7e586o5GQ26SmI73izvtOY4wFwrHcrTDd X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:1c27:b0:73d:ce49:6dd7 with SMTP id nc39-20020a1709071c2700b0073dce496dd7mr37841001ejc.470.1662434959611; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 20:29:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1662434959; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ZLXzQ1trn+p6RVcwoOXlO/3zMAKUuhGS8OXWTVYwe7jvpH2swxK9/2pivcW3K5hiox fH6zWJ1AHJM/+93+RebE5NGFf0c6CkpdKeAmVx9o8GvEq1mgnxEi4YVGZh2K+2q/nHGH uIXAJezb6RiEFDG5H8zoa3ucu/ORAoy5lNelZ8sqyuYcJ8rMRGiT2eri6WINU+pvvTAv 7OMy8mYvkaIVrhzgIZooxZNoEGRSQ+9fUv9Hzhcb2xLWh2hKnccYKQcV/rGNRmwhtsmi fSsMMKrzprbrviIDoFMTi0Pk1s3WZKcpNeafLGO4npAmXUSfWdxtlMsqtPG3f9MjB55u 0fyg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=DL2uVwExbtWwEe4F5r/jWUr5/aKbKx+Lizws5HPBS20=; b=D3SrwoZNfFBRfrmR9JQZjarY0xzQrzXHPkkpCfaWfB9ZHlFtZm3V6lHDbwzT4Avxmm qXH1d5mqNRaq/V0OYk/TQlqp/DSsGtOm1GTVSYYS0+NdQkcZcTtEbCDucQ4ao1osLy/2 LiVCGBvDGqgx1zDpfbJ0efWmKiXmpDJxslK/4l+XpxzBoWWBySOpmuV2gtFNwvNFCMGO 5HS2ks/S+90bGs85vzOMFvHyZe72DAPToHhZVMGGmkcl49x2XbK899ZvXOAhxE/k+V7e ybCh0oXLJzUlm5KXDmTYMDYF8wU7IyMAlP4/G0NKahzLg/VbuGFJQWoZF+OrlnvE2CSo tLgA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=iR8pv6Hb; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x2-20020a05640225c200b00446b76abb29si9021720edb.540.2022.09.05.20.28.55; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 20:29:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=iR8pv6Hb; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237816AbiIFDPp (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 5 Sep 2022 23:15:45 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38498 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232981AbiIFDPj (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Sep 2022 23:15:39 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-xd43.google.com (mail-io1-xd43.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d43]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4C3F27CD7; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 20:15:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd43.google.com with SMTP id b142so7933514iof.10; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 20:15:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=DL2uVwExbtWwEe4F5r/jWUr5/aKbKx+Lizws5HPBS20=; b=iR8pv6HblribuScgnquxx0UhX4eILA5+v836mbx6m403NXEdKJM23ZoYO2BlFtCw8c lsl48lme9v02LIlFqNZxKk3teZkYaU1M66LybsOIupX3OOO7RvbF+HKblJeoH7eb9csI x4/QQ4doGfJe8aHGGb6ZzWhRBuWLlm+ffmuwswWUIYPYgMvVQN/xTYYGhk9R/OIvnDIE KBAY5whycKTqW5KT97FEBxHbjMp8kkdO4xEMWg13kmDLGIiSPsTa/vTYqE+8v5Q6c2O5 EGuLEskm90lWrrIFX09nulZ6tv3y5GDkqeaZNlG0ROAXRyjC7hpJFgbURYEShnoKJTu6 /V5g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=DL2uVwExbtWwEe4F5r/jWUr5/aKbKx+Lizws5HPBS20=; b=718YGMp04QjdMgOB08JJHysYmfapYWTAPg2JXC3KXGJmbtVTRjJl9foILkqfGl1B7r SrethYRMrqnS8MPetslyaSU+WKzOH5/aQDosIHRuf8/gKe+dHcrl9XvR6yCRDRgNXdLW ghHIyDmDwaq9Va4tJYze95Ge0PqkIDU4Or3es6hvAgkfNfMnxRLWUHStmbwZqC8kgiwk ecDzPCM57QziE616o7xeW4V7CqE87H2aGU9syIkWv6lm4HcceskrfpuboYOyPPFcG2O0 BlqhSehEGyD1LWMhKvqvWlnb+4hg5ag/W06psPHwfQDS3+dGFRT9mehPNDhEZk6zzgOQ xxzQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo0FV+m4yXLvTrTYMDvqRggDkdzuo7zZR+Con/9Bc6wjogxKfL/L l9CXeWxhfIdLT/6BaYuD9s19hCZ62T/fpyOiAsw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:2d8b:b0:688:ece0:e1da with SMTP id k11-20020a0566022d8b00b00688ece0e1damr23547118iow.18.1662434137169; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 20:15:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220905143318.1592015-1-roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com> <20220905143318.1592015-13-roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com> In-Reply-To: <20220905143318.1592015-13-roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com> From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2022 05:15:01 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 12/12] selftests/bpf: Add tests for dynamic pointers parameters in kfuncs To: Roberto Sassu Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yhs@fb.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com, haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, mykolal@fb.com, dhowells@redhat.com, jarkko@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, mingo@redhat.com, paul@paul-moore.com, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, shuah@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, deso@posteo.net, Roberto Sassu Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 5 Sept 2022 at 16:36, Roberto Sassu wrote: > > From: Roberto Sassu > > Add tests to ensure that only supported dynamic pointer types are accepted, > that the passed argument is actually a dynamic pointer, and that the passed > argument is a pointer to the stack. > > The tests are currently in the deny list for s390x (JIT does not support > calling kernel function). > > Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu > --- > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x | 1 + > .../bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_dynptr_param.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++ > .../bpf/progs/test_kfunc_dynptr_param.c | 57 ++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 161 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_dynptr_param.c > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_kfunc_dynptr_param.c > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x > index 4e305baa5277..9a6dc3671c65 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x > @@ -71,3 +71,4 @@ cgroup_hierarchical_stats # JIT does not support calling kernel f > htab_update # failed to attach: ERROR: strerror_r(-524)=22 (trampoline) > lookup_key # JIT does not support calling kernel function (kfunc) > verify_pkcs7_sig # JIT does not support calling kernel function (kfunc) > +kfunc_dynptr_param # JIT does not support calling kernel function (kfunc) > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_dynptr_param.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_dynptr_param.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..ea655a5c9d8b > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_dynptr_param.c > @@ -0,0 +1,103 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > + > +/* > + * Copyright (c) 2022 Facebook > + * Copyright (C) 2022 Huawei Technologies Duesseldorf GmbH > + * > + * Author: Roberto Sassu > + */ > + > +#include > +#include "test_kfunc_dynptr_param.skel.h" > + > +static size_t log_buf_sz = 1048576; /* 1 MB */ > +static char obj_log_buf[1048576]; > + > +static struct { > + const char *prog_name; > + const char *expected_err_msg; > +} kfunc_dynptr_tests[] = { > + {"dynptr_type_not_supp", > + "arg#0 pointer type STRUCT bpf_dynptr_kern points to unsupported dynamic pointer type"}, > + {"not_valid_dynptr", > + "arg#0 pointer type STRUCT bpf_dynptr_kern must be valid and initialized"}, > + {"not_ptr_to_stack", "arg#0 pointer type STRUCT bpf_dynptr_kern not to stack"}, > +}; > + > +static bool kfunc_not_supported; > + > +static int libbpf_print_cb(enum libbpf_print_level level, const char *fmt, > + va_list args) > +{ > + if (strcmp(fmt, "libbpf: extern (func ksym) '%s': not found in kernel or module BTFs\n")) > + return 0; > + > + if (strcmp(va_arg(args, char *), "bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature")) > + return 0; > + > + kfunc_not_supported = true; > + return 0; > +} > + > +static void verify_fail(const char *prog_name, const char *expected_err_msg) > +{ > + struct test_kfunc_dynptr_param *skel; > + LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts); > + libbpf_print_fn_t old_print_cb; > + struct bpf_program *prog; > + int err; > + > + opts.kernel_log_buf = obj_log_buf; > + opts.kernel_log_size = log_buf_sz; > + opts.kernel_log_level = 1; > + > + skel = test_kfunc_dynptr_param__open_opts(&opts); > + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_kfunc_dynptr_param__open_opts")) > + goto cleanup; > + > + prog = bpf_object__find_program_by_name(skel->obj, prog_name); > + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(prog, "bpf_object__find_program_by_name")) > + goto cleanup; > + > + bpf_program__set_autoload(prog, true); > + > + bpf_map__set_max_entries(skel->maps.ringbuf, getpagesize()); > + > + kfunc_not_supported = false; > + > + old_print_cb = libbpf_set_print(libbpf_print_cb); > + err = test_kfunc_dynptr_param__load(skel); > + libbpf_set_print(old_print_cb); > + > + if (err < 0 && kfunc_not_supported) { > + fprintf(stderr, > + "%s:SKIP:bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature() kfunc not supported\n", > + __func__); > + test__skip(); > + goto cleanup; > + } > + > + if (!ASSERT_ERR(err, "unexpected load success")) > + goto cleanup; > + > + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(strstr(obj_log_buf, expected_err_msg), "expected_err_msg")) { > + fprintf(stderr, "Expected err_msg: %s\n", expected_err_msg); > + fprintf(stderr, "Verifier output: %s\n", obj_log_buf); > + } > + > +cleanup: > + test_kfunc_dynptr_param__destroy(skel); > +} > + > +void test_kfunc_dynptr_param(void) > +{ > + int i; > + > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(kfunc_dynptr_tests); i++) { > + if (!test__start_subtest(kfunc_dynptr_tests[i].prog_name)) > + continue; > + > + verify_fail(kfunc_dynptr_tests[i].prog_name, > + kfunc_dynptr_tests[i].expected_err_msg); > + } > +} > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_kfunc_dynptr_param.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_kfunc_dynptr_param.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..2f09f91a1576 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_kfunc_dynptr_param.c > @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > + > +/* > + * Copyright (C) 2022 Huawei Technologies Duesseldorf GmbH > + * > + * Author: Roberto Sassu > + */ > + > +#include "vmlinux.h" > +#include > +#include > +#include > + > +struct bpf_dynptr { > + __u64 :64; > + __u64 :64; > +} __attribute__((aligned(8))); > + > +extern int bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature(struct bpf_dynptr *data_ptr, > + struct bpf_dynptr *sig_ptr, > + struct bpf_key *trusted_keyring) __ksym; > + > +struct { > + __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_RINGBUF); > +} ringbuf SEC(".maps"); > + > +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; > + > +SEC("?lsm.s/bpf") > +int BPF_PROG(dynptr_type_not_supp, int cmd, union bpf_attr *attr, > + unsigned int size) > +{ > + char write_data[64] = "hello there, world!!"; > + struct bpf_dynptr ptr; > + > + bpf_ringbuf_reserve_dynptr(&ringbuf, sizeof(write_data), 0, &ptr); > + > + return bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature(&ptr, &ptr, NULL); > +} > + > +SEC("?lsm.s/bpf") > +int BPF_PROG(not_valid_dynptr, int cmd, union bpf_attr *attr, unsigned int size) > +{ > + unsigned long val; > + > + return bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature((struct bpf_dynptr *)&val, > + (struct bpf_dynptr *)&val, NULL); > +} > + > +SEC("?lsm.s/bpf") > +int BPF_PROG(not_ptr_to_stack, int cmd, union bpf_attr *attr, unsigned int size) > +{ > + unsigned long val; > + > + return bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature((struct bpf_dynptr *)val, > + (struct bpf_dynptr *)val, NULL); Please also include a test where you cause the dynptr to be set to NULL, e.g. by passing invalid stuff to ringbuf_reserve_dynptr, and then try to pass it to bpf_verify_pkc7_signature. > +} > -- > 2.25.1 >