Received: by 2002:a05:6358:bb9e:b0:b9:5105:a5b4 with SMTP id df30csp4501431rwb; Tue, 6 Sep 2022 08:21:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR44bZ5qoQO0/LIBz6jzSdG6Ha9pFGBUlX12xkypTcCHda/85ewZDomoRVMVwKFP0c2moFl3 X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:a043:b0:76f:f5a3:1bac with SMTP id gz3-20020a170907a04300b0076ff5a31bacmr1043761ejc.452.1662477689011; Tue, 06 Sep 2022 08:21:29 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1662477689; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=xyTS8Q8MWzU2mKEci9TUaQ4NnkceTJ74mC3uVp5jEKwCdV1K96VGerpaq8zv8+LFqI hdTY6dfYWn6lZT0XRUo7J/3qlFj9/gJkhi9xTIii3NVxePottf4dHr6t8Y3vMjJddqVH 8GrleqNIDzbOjMIHPh0jukOm6r2tROsx4ju5SeDXxH/5nLqM3go0RnnjGVtDDMppBnwh BD/WVusBjzyeDpfccBJqEBIt0eBwth689TPPQvw1VQ5awIyMukmo7L49HBa2LDPtuxJ3 SGsQeH++aA0Y/XDHe9CoAQesD1/gZ80UiccOGFbEFjYrJ/GeNwslffYMyMd+mcejJQkr 9pcA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:organization:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=DHZkNml8bYAoV1NuLWwNQh0dWqiFFB3Rf3rkR47ZXMU=; b=bWjr7bbYlmUJsV5ZMEl0NK6oCqMVyU3EyBIjJ69F1PLbCuBxp67aMHpq9MtahwE2ra F6Z6gYGqcsZo5aizlTcfWyCq2z6Q664/VJfOKdXlsX68NLCUWVKeVezzsz9NgYheD6gH mt46U/M0/CTP8etkluI99CK4i/qigfEOzbx2hdto+uH8e+Q0ly0T4g5s1rwLf2r71wo/ pOMAtESHkBvxeHEcsES8kavYCEWYOEFd5SOpZpWw5Rcc58tmk9pC5ZWXcEnE3OX5ydUr k6ONZecvd+eHd63Qv+CgVjNI9oLgV0/Pygz/2SZCId8DCWaKghVgQmFodPLn4sIFIRCG 327Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=Li0A6WGq; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f17-20020a0564021e9100b004482384c271si11779564edf.621.2022.09.06.08.21.03; Tue, 06 Sep 2022 08:21:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=Li0A6WGq; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232859AbiIFO51 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 6 Sep 2022 10:57:27 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46782 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238907AbiIFO4v (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Sep 2022 10:56:51 -0400 Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F41E5A6C7F; Tue, 6 Sep 2022 07:12:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1662473557; x=1694009557; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=wFM4+ipDAARS/vDb2JTydobm8ytemLFf7Wn8G0k0SmU=; b=Li0A6WGq4wK3aeq6/zO0KStWldRG58pIpm770cUR5kg1RsGHoBUXC2s8 Vpzt6e4aGQYxMPjF0gfck4DqqD2D/BjIEPQigLiTWm7CDeDOQo5KGz2sr ok2IFxtHw+XENSCp1+LazlggqHe0qk7yTwApTTyNiAbO7+LL47xWan2lc AAj1DU4blE4317LqCBZ5OZ+9RtOwt0Y36DZR0wKW+FSGgOpv+JNsu4FQL uICDiswF9N4kFvLN9faMtgXfVQPrg4qFXiS9LHc3CzIGvZcg2pKPvYlFj nLRwWVeVRpoe2mAalrOzakJC1VNkfW1GxXlkRTOzf8nBmwCeaSBOilpC/ w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10462"; a="382898766" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,294,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="382898766" Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Sep 2022 07:10:59 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,294,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="682410019" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga004-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Sep 2022 07:10:53 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1oVZHu-0099IH-35; Tue, 06 Sep 2022 17:10:50 +0300 Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2022 17:10:50 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Eliav Farber Cc: jdelvare@suse.com, linux@roeck-us.net, robh+dt@kernel.org, p.zabel@pengutronix.de, rtanwar@maxlinear.com, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hhhawa@amazon.com, jonnyc@amazon.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/21] hwmon: (mr75203) fix multi-channel voltage reading Message-ID: References: <20220906083356.21067-1-farbere@amazon.com> <20220906083356.21067-7-farbere@amazon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220906083356.21067-7-farbere@amazon.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 08:33:41AM +0000, Eliav Farber wrote: > Fix voltage allocation and reading to support all channels in all VMs. > Prior to this change allocation and reading were done only for the first > channel in each VM. > This change counts the total number of channels for allocation, and takes > into account the channel offset when reading the sample data register. ... > + total_ch = ch_num * vm_num; > + in_config = devm_kcalloc(dev, total_ch + 1, > sizeof(*in_config), GFP_KERNEL); Strictly speaking this should be `size_add(size_mul(...) ...)` construction from overflow.h. total_ch = size_mul(ch_num, vm_num); in_config = devm_kcalloc(dev, size_add(total_ch, 1), sizeof(*in_config), GFP_KERNEL); Alternatively before doing all these, add a check if (array3_size(ch_num, vm_num, sizeof(*in_config)) < SIZE_MAX - sizeof(*in_config)) return -EOVERFLOW; But this is a bit monstrous. Seems like the above looks and feels better. Also for backporting purposes perhaps it's fine to do without using those macro helpers. > if (!in_config) > return -ENOMEM; -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko