Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 6 Sep 2022 23:42:15 +0200
From:   Pali =?utf-8?B?Um9ow6Fy?= <pali@kernel.org>
To:     Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc:     Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= <kw@linux.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: mvebu: switch to using gpiod API
Message-ID: <20220906214215.7hmt5vpk2yzxdm2e@pali>
References: <20220906204301.3736813-1-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
 <20220906204301.3736813-2-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
 <20220906211628.6u4hbpn4shjcvqel@pali>
 <Yxe7CJnIT5AiUilL@google.com>
 <Yxe+P27mwZQMZK+5@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <Yxe+P27mwZQMZK+5@google.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
Precedence: bulk

On Tuesday 06 September 2022 14:40:15 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 02:26:32PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Hi Pali,
> > 
> > On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 11:16:28PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > Hello!
> > > 
> > > On Tuesday 06 September 2022 13:43:01 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > This patch switches the driver away from legacy gpio/of_gpio API to
> > > > gpiod API, and removes use of of_get_named_gpio_flags() which I want to
> > > > make private to gpiolib.
> > > 
> > > There are many pending pci-mvebu.c patches waiting for review and merge,
> > > so I would suggest to wait until all other mvebu patches are processed
> > > and then process this one... longer waiting period :-(
> > 
> > OK, it is not super urgent. OTOH it is a very simple patch :)
> 
> By the way, do the pending patches address soft-leaking of reset GPIO
> when the driver fails to acquire clock for a port (I called it
> soft-leaking since devm will free it on unbind)?

I think no, because there is not any patch related to GPIO reset.