To: "Gabor Czigola" <czigola@gmail.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
References: <3a0f49600706171014m6bc9af34s9dda0ea282a4d63@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
Organization: Red Hat OS Tools Group
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 15:55:23 -0300
In-Reply-To: <3a0f49600706171014m6bc9af34s9dda0ea282a4d63@mail.gmail.com> (Gabor Czigola's message of "Sun\, 17 Jun 2007 19\:14\:03 +0200")
Message-ID: <orfy4qh0mc.fsf@oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.990 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1077
Lines: 22

On Jun 17, 2007, "Gabor Czigola" <czigola@gmail.com> wrote:

> I wonder why the linux kernel development community couldn't propose
> an own GPL draft (say v2.2) that is "as free as v2" and that includes
> some ideas (from v3) that are considered as good (free, innovative, in
> the spirit of whatever etc.) by the majority of the kernel developers.

For one, because the text of the GPL is copyrighted by the FSF, and
licensed without permission for modification.  And that's as it should
be, you don't want others to modify the terms of the license you chose
for your code, do you?

-- 
Alexandre Oliva         http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
FSF Latin America Board Member         http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/