Received: by 2002:a05:6358:bb9e:b0:b9:5105:a5b4 with SMTP id df30csp5378410rwb; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 01:42:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR47H5M4QL2eKfRBupi87XK1bAOXUF+l5Pv612Ac9i23TUZXOOOnj2vvtv1JEVlrocCNxh+W X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:5002:b0:444:26fd:d341 with SMTP id p2-20020a056402500200b0044426fdd341mr2221753eda.351.1662540178098; Wed, 07 Sep 2022 01:42:58 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1662540178; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=NfReD7AT/M/xI+tbBGwddIo4vCjmjV1fLvKm4raW7Xp0B6S91PsX0tjSUEYkLXYMW4 HORJcdZxKBYmK6RgiyR1ucDXqOtznlwSJ8GKpnSP3UPZlH6qtWcdmU330OCV6tbX5bhZ xUeiXW2NVk3VRsvWdoL+t6pZNXP2RbtqWC1s61FDkgGf9B9tOC9QRJcbiyHgr3NhsYgV B5k8zzjvLa2tZbdAipVKSV4iGbfdbf4URmSEn9L3ozWzzjATbTDE5DJhWjk4QwxtNg6C eb/JWQtKmC7LXdTBaNWFEDBxunp3y2d2H+VNl5D1Af1eVhcJofLgg7fUnMghVIJLKySy 5/8Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject :message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :dkim-signature; bh=70UlwKdvq7GCSl1IbEvE1dyc4cQjRqwl7FIkEoDrwBc=; b=ZdI5rLYnDGHoB11azjPmJcfZ8QkW4VBe5yiDIAQ39JcJy5Gy+7BXymyuotDMYWqpib h/w+YDqeoqVMW+TYBhHrWbnWnC3UxCZGVL9YSrqlJbJHaH6HViF1AKSke6pf5MuRaScr ki5WL99hOpdjueXZkPHaWx1Eb7EF+gQiwMmGv4MXRXkzbe3mAuzf9OapZE9ca1ggfpR2 y5i0WgCbW8RjakYyGN8K1RfgGNIY6Lu4keIk+4eH8QIL2aH8vANmNCtLAfzgTkmHy7kJ CnuRc9iC4uGPghZ7vSkpFFWUbdESnKgFFwxsABGlD0VsWC8U1eaTsafEpWt7NB9F+8ik ueGg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=gxENM3C5; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id og36-20020a1709071de400b0073dd47c3873si10906219ejc.878.2022.09.07.01.42.32; Wed, 07 Sep 2022 01:42:58 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=gxENM3C5; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230044AbiIGHqr (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 7 Sep 2022 03:46:47 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40326 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229939AbiIGHqc (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Sep 2022 03:46:32 -0400 Received: from mail-vs1-xe31.google.com (mail-vs1-xe31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e31]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF1569E8B5; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 00:46:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-vs1-xe31.google.com with SMTP id n125so14051557vsc.5; Wed, 07 Sep 2022 00:46:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=70UlwKdvq7GCSl1IbEvE1dyc4cQjRqwl7FIkEoDrwBc=; b=gxENM3C5F/mywTCZjPzfG6V5EIvSHxSCqhJc0UIsQZrs0XWrlJVrw0WQrNZRioOOiP wDLaRWt5myCkFnsgPQFpDQgUDPTWODeEW50CByj0vbbs+rcipZ9tN3NQ1BAPsDSJnjyO 2opDHjziA3CpiB0JiYyVfKsQ6dmaCK4/bzXbWTtwUL2TqY0M9xyxbqabDHlATL1EffBO EPXQFtZjcdQ2bo9cp5iVPmyADfCdH/8LNrBKek3LdfQqHcOFheLwo5f5pm/up29C3XzE PJ39NymUSNHGnCzJzDqmFnGjbEsP5kbUGXmO4GmZttcwC6R5SBAyzungYgtwYYA6t/gb kGxg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date; bh=70UlwKdvq7GCSl1IbEvE1dyc4cQjRqwl7FIkEoDrwBc=; b=G63ye3JtXHcR+vPJEx6uRc0m7vINjUY10XRaFtgc6s6bq92GnmaLj3itnplsKZpL/c iqJrhYNT42KvRjXop86d18ApaL9y6vgwhmkTRO680k/CaK+awduM6PQ7TYhzSlZLW96L Sn8956FLnieoIu4Z3Rc49DmtLas/mreTOlP/pHWC60jkf+ndl24JY/glTgeG5XtouEn0 b4D5uXHVYI9AemLWDvC82yUEt0K3h/UrKH08YUqDO2zkj0sS7DCRLxXfKlDqQqU0OxNt XvSDamWVbCAN/ES+F4NTJlzW2O1IbGGYv90WIXr0xgGSSr76JkE3kx7EO+NO2Vy4L4p1 9nIw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2yIC5PAYQmcjN00Av2izvc8Zhk2BNihWhFisBxxNFr2bz9paP0 BYxCg5F0gL80T6dvvrJq1Fmm7RIR7/1vU3+slN3vAhsZJkQ= X-Received: by 2002:a67:d00f:0:b0:397:f237:98f3 with SMTP id r15-20020a67d00f000000b00397f23798f3mr613990vsi.71.1662536790612; Wed, 07 Sep 2022 00:46:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220906183600.1926315-1-teratipally@google.com> In-Reply-To: <20220906183600.1926315-1-teratipally@google.com> From: Amir Goldstein Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 10:46:19 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Request to cherry-pick 01ea173e103edd5ec41acec65b9261b87e123fc2 to v5.10 To: Varsha Teratipally Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" , linux-xfs , linux-kernel , stable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 9:36 PM Varsha Teratipally wrote: > > Hi all, > > Commit 01ea173e103edd5ec41acec65b9261b87e123fc2 (upstream: xfs: fix up > non-directory creation in SGID directories) fixes an issue where in xfs > sometimes, a local user could create files with an unitended group > permissions as an owner and execution where a directory is SGID and belon= gs to a certain group and is writable by a user who is not a member of this= group and seems like a good candidate for the v5.10 stable tree given that= 5.10 is used in versions of debian, ubuntu. > > This patch applies cleanly. Let me know what you think > Since you already posted the patch, I wrote what I think on the post: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/CAOQ4uxi_Q8aXUg+FM0Q9__t=3DKqJSVqOgkS8j8k= NC3MQfniZLWA@mail.gmail.com/ Bottom line - I think that the patch should be applied to 5.10.y without further delay. Thanks, Amir.