Received: by 2002:a05:6358:bb9e:b0:b9:5105:a5b4 with SMTP id df30csp5395463rwb; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 02:03:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7HPlM8/p2kkFfwmGrDBRxdD8AqKOy0Re6URYveM4hJKv+dg4HsXG7gD391h2YERZPLM/U2 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:da86:b0:740:7120:c6e6 with SMTP id xh6-20020a170906da8600b007407120c6e6mr1679242ejb.44.1662541423447; Wed, 07 Sep 2022 02:03:43 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1662541423; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=TJCPeDbbjHt8mgmUlruhiOP6k0tqFbM6p87pvRb4XitwL9szxRy23MS3jL5TQK2Zy9 G1hIcmZUQtR2WRpciVHM/W3wIraKM0Hw8E1IbgfNMiYLyqQAkqr32UX70QJhTUFTHI26 /u7gL2WBO/9Qe/1afqwW2P+0t+GaFOoTDpwFS3IcChHAYrcZnOeUeeBdUeCIeFBEqB9g lQ/HnZ60Vwv/910jgsEPG1Oyf2hUSFF3VVkpXfEDKa7QsaErAJ9kKA3O8h+caFK/lplg TEETUIAospDALxO9mez3YDAbfm/AnQPeukE6ByAV7tnRbs728Zgx6e3y2W0dutlERZey rtAw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature :dkim-signature; bh=rVqiRDITeo6/2WfId1Gqy1iWaPcx504+D/1P0NH/A0w=; b=oxaYVvAvGfN7dLaUbQYAPeWLiWyC/CK6nOpuwjGgVVVT5Y1wj0VA4ep6RaJG2MO5ZD r6rl8yKDP+ko906T5T2oxl/0zq+YHW2XQEnAUAGl5agc5SrlUM6ktaLLKtyPCBtRYx6S AJl0Qy7gELyWY87JSxrLov2Txv9S1mn9rU89ExHpiBdOU7zRzvLcacP9NvE5bHTMe5e2 y5RPpyUtqiK77idhQnNEcLidDmNBqV3xtUtL7pdmdgBdaTNsbTfjVeIFsT8ZNaGx5DO9 cUhMwdKAJY4mkZBVSNg9JtxcU1r18zk4rcoxxbTxT3etNPdTvvwyXAyJ4iT4gCByUFw7 muXA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.de header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=B+Da76Av; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.de header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=EnwlkB6g; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=suse.de Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q11-20020a056402518b00b0043c94d7ddb8si12769414edd.204.2022.09.07.02.03.18; Wed, 07 Sep 2022 02:03:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.de header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=B+Da76Av; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.de header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=EnwlkB6g; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=suse.de Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229954AbiIGIvs (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 7 Sep 2022 04:51:48 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35286 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229959AbiIGIvl (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Sep 2022 04:51:41 -0400 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29C669A999 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 01:51:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 968CF33BD3; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 08:51:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1662540696; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=rVqiRDITeo6/2WfId1Gqy1iWaPcx504+D/1P0NH/A0w=; b=B+Da76AvP5qd5n/XSoO+CQ11LjuZAJ/Tc7RSSWkiCoV5OU053CxMIqzzxpjwdZfZ1lUliV DaQYMmsjZ3Yx/hxre6tWK8vt8ziWQGj51HY5B3YdZ2rDyoXwy4/d/yvPYDb5yi0jZ9V/Op AWtrF6O0U27i5MBjbIP4GaPmS7RRkEw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1662540696; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=rVqiRDITeo6/2WfId1Gqy1iWaPcx504+D/1P0NH/A0w=; b=EnwlkB6gYQpBJjD1PePOjqhi3OWJgkn/eh8l18/3C9T5ZtDr4GZlK3sQBDSu7AacMcYSZo Usktknrunp9cyYBQ== Received: from suse.de (unknown [10.163.32.246]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59A092C141; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 08:51:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 09:51:33 +0100 From: Mel Gorman To: Abel Wu Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Vincent Guittot , Josh Don , Chen Yu , Yicong Yang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] sched/fair: cleanup for SIS_PROP Message-ID: <20220907085133.nazbi7wftff46jrg@suse.de> References: <20220901131107.71785-1-wuyun.abel@bytedance.com> <20220901131107.71785-5-wuyun.abel@bytedance.com> <20220901140311.xi3y72uxdwbpxzrq@suse.de> <6ab7ecbb-d0fb-dc44-cada-fcdc5b9676d0@bytedance.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6ab7ecbb-d0fb-dc44-cada-fcdc5b9676d0@bytedance.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 03:59:33PM +0800, Abel Wu wrote: > On 9/1/22 10:03 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 09:11:07PM +0800, Abel Wu wrote: > > > The sched-domain of this cpu is only used when SIS_PROP is enabled, > > > and it should be irrelevant whether the local sd_llc is valid or > > > not, since all we care about is target sd_llc if !SIS_PROP. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Abel Wu > > > > This could conceivably result in an uninitialised memory access if > > SIS_PROP was enabled while select_idle_cpu is running. I'm not sure if > > it can happen when jump labels are in use but I think it could happen > > for !CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL updating the sysctl_sched_features bitmap updated > > via sysctl. > > > > The patch is still a good idea because it moves an unlikely rcu_deference > > out of the default path for sched features but either this_sd needs to > > be initialised to NULL and checked or the this_sd lookup needs to happen > > twice at a slight additional cost to the default-disabled SIS_PROP path. > > > > Hi Mel, please check the following resent patch, Thanks! > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220902033032.79846-5-wuyun.abel@bytedance.com/ Weird, I don't remember seeing this patch even though I'm cc'd on it. It looks fine so even though it's the wrong thread; Acked-by: Mel Gorman -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs