Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] LoongArch: tools: Add relocs tool support
To:     Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>, Jinyang He <hejinyang@loongson.cn>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>
References: <1662113335-14282-1-git-send-email-tangyouling@loongson.cn>
 <1662113335-14282-2-git-send-email-tangyouling@loongson.cn>
 <c9880165f0355fc3be3ec23153b43ad33e558b5d.camel@xry111.site>
 <4df8a26c49a35c1fce36d80c370f738fa71a2bef.camel@xry111.site>
 <f0e77716-9533-724a-2ea9-86bc5b52066c@loongson.cn>
 <78a4a6b0970c309daa336a2329e69d28df486552.camel@xry111.site>
 <fffdd2ac-4ba6-8eb3-f269-b22a3d9c32f6@loongson.cn>
 <0b2d115c42ff6cb9b8c65d852ec2f0746ca6e8d9.camel@xry111.site>
 <d852f590-95b4-3fd1-924a-68c0a6bb1b1b@loongson.cn>
 <29cd929b-185b-1c4b-f200-08f2a724b59d@loongson.cn>
 <a218373f773ef193903daa528291ec8bb384ddd2.camel@xry111.site>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
        Xuerui Wang <kernel@xen0n.name>,
        Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>
From:   Youling Tang <tangyouling@loongson.cn>
Message-ID: <83a7aad8-125b-29b5-715d-0061ce1b0647@loongson.cn>
Date:   Wed, 7 Sep 2022 18:19:10 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux mips64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <a218373f773ef193903daa528291ec8bb384ddd2.camel@xry111.site>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi, Ruoyao

On 09/06/2022 01:17 PM, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-09-06 at 10:16 +0800, Youling Tang wrote:
>
>> Switch to relative exception tables:
>>
>> https://github.com/tangyouling/linux/commit/6525b8da
>> https://github.com/tangyouling/linux/commit/b6ac0827
>>
>> Will switch to the relative exception tables after applying the above
>> two patches. So there is no need to relocate the exception table
>> (remove relocate_exception_table).
>>
>> Now we can remove the relocation of la.abs , got and ex_table, but
>> still need to relocate LARCH_64. Is there anything else that needs to
>> be modified to eliminate this relocation?
>
> You may see the RISC-V patch as a reference:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211009171259.2515351-2-alexandre.ghiti@canonical.com/
>
> Basically, make the linker to generate R_*_RELATIVE instead of R_*_64
> for pointers.  And, perform R_*_RELATIVE relocation loading the kernel.
>
> Something problematic IMO: RISC-V uses "-shared" to trick the linker to
> generate R_*_RELATIVE but I consider it ugly (if the kernel is a shared
> library, my grandma will be a wagon!)  I prefer "-pie -static", but our
> Glibc does not have static-pie support for now.  It won't really affect
> the kernel (we are -nostdlib), but we cannot learn how to handle
> R_*_RELATIVE in static pie from Glibc then.
>

After applying all the patches in the link [1], the implementation of 
the relocs tool can now be removed :).

commit: 244fb0971a ... ad45233ef6

[1] https://github.com/tangyouling/loongarch-next/commits/loongarch-next

Youling.