Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Sender: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 7 Sep 2022 05:26:09 -1000
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To:     Zhongkun He <hezhongkun.hzk@bytedance.com>
Cc:     lizefan.x@bytedance.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
        cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Phishing Risk] Re: [Phishing Risk] [External] Re: [PATCH]
 cgroup/cpuset: Add a new isolated mems.policy type.
Message-ID: <Yxi4EYxMaPNkL+of@slm.duckdns.org>
References: <20220902063303.1057-1-hezhongkun.hzk@bytedance.com>
 <YxT/liaotbiOod51@slm.duckdns.org>
 <c05bdeac-b354-0ac7-3233-27f8e5cbb38a@bytedance.com>
 <YxeBGeOaQxvlPLzo@slm.duckdns.org>
 <d323bd95-476b-0901-855e-14c8796d1b23@bytedance.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <d323bd95-476b-0901-855e-14c8796d1b23@bytedance.com>
Precedence: bulk

Hello,

On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 08:06:30PM +0800, Zhongkun He wrote:
> It would be better if one process had a way to dynamically modify the
> mempolicy of another process. But unfortunately there is no interface or
> system call to do that in userspace.

If you need to change the properties dynamically, I suggest adding this as a
dynamic per-process interface first. That's more generic and useful for more
cases.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun