Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 13:52:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 13:51:18 -0500 Received: from cpe-24-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net ([24.221.152.185]:3753 "EHLO opus.bloom.county") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 13:50:49 -0500 Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 11:50:49 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: raul@viadomus.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [kbuild-devel] Converting the 2.5 kernel to kbuild 2.5 Message-ID: <20011204185049.GP17651@cpe-24-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 07:50:45PM +0100, Ra?l N??ez de Arenas Coronado wrote: > >The spec for CML2 is out there, and there's even a CML2-in-C project. > > How advanced? Where is the spec, please? I'm not sure how far the C version is, the spec is: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/cml2/cml2-reference.html > >> The kernel should depend just on the compiler and assembler, IMHO. > >The right tools for the right job. C is good for the kernel. Python is > >good at manipulating strings. > > Well, IMHO Python is good only in being big and doing things > slow, but... why the parser cannot be built over flex/bison?. That > way it can be 'pregenerated' and people won't need additional tools > to build the kernel. ESR didn't feel it was the right choice, basically. -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/