Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 8 Sep 2022 08:17:11 +0300
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To:     Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
        Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
        linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
        James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] security/keys: Remove inconsistent __user annotation
Message-ID: <Yxl614jNUYvYywUc@kernel.org>
References: <20220907121230.21252-1-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
 <f1cefdb9-363a-c938-f02a-851173431610@infradead.org>
 <CAHC9VhQytyFMvq-M0YrqzKxJDyj58KKG0XDjBfTV02sYCzeALQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHC9VhQytyFMvq-M0YrqzKxJDyj58KKG0XDjBfTV02sYCzeALQ@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 11:43:17AM -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 10:06 AM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
> > On 9/7/22 05:12, Vincenzo Frascino wrote:
> > > The declaration of keyring_read does not match the definition
> > > (security/keys/keyring.c). In this case the definition is correct
> > > because it matches what defined in "struct key_type::read"
> > > (linux/key-type.h).
> > >
> > > Fix the declaration removing the inconsistent __user annotation.
> > >
> > > Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> > > Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
> > > Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
> > > ---
> > > Note: This issue was discovered during the porting of the linux kernel
> > > on Morello [1].
> > >
> > > [1] https://git.morello-project.org/morello/kernel/linux
> >
> > FTR, I have sent this same patch 3 times.
> > Good luck.
> 
> David or Jarkko, this patch is both trivial and obviously correct,
> please merge this into the keys tree for the next merge window else
> I'll take it via the LSM tree.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

I picked it to my tree.

BR, Jarkko