Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 8 Sep 2022 13:06:34 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
        linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
        devel@acpica.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Elie Morisse <syniurge@gmail.com>,
        Nehal Shah <nehal-bakulchandra.shah@amd.com>,
        Shyam Sundar S K <shyam-sundar.s-k@amd.com>,
        Khalil Blaiech <kblaiech@nvidia.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>,
        Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>,
        Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 8/8] efi/dev-path-parser: Refactor _UID handling to
 use acpi_dev_uid_to_integer()
Message-ID: <Yxm+qgOKCSJ8z0b5@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20220907164606.65742-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
 <20220907164606.65742-9-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
 <CAMj1kXFLgo2fC80Z6zKUC8ULyLrFJ7XOvzwE5tYYLtzDhqqHOw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXFLgo2fC80Z6zKUC8ULyLrFJ7XOvzwE5tYYLtzDhqqHOw@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 10:20:47AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Sept 2022 at 18:57, Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:

...

> >         for_each_acpi_dev_match(adev, hid, NULL, -1) {
> > -               if (adev->pnp.unique_id && !strcmp(adev->pnp.unique_id, uid))
> > +               ret = acpi_dev_uid_to_integer(adev, &uid);
> > +               if (ret == -ENODATA && node->acpi.uid == 0)
> >                         break;
> > -               if (!adev->pnp.unique_id && node->acpi.uid == 0)
> > +               if (ret == 0 && node->acpi.uid == uid)
> 
> Is it necessary to reorder the conditions here? I.e., why not

Code-wise there should be not much difference which does not affect the flow,
I think I moved it to be closer to the pattern "let's handle errors first",
but in this case I'm fine with your proposal.

> > +               ret = acpi_dev_uid_to_integer(adev, &uid);
> > +               if (ret == 0 && node->acpi.uid == uid)
> >                         break;
> > +               if (ret == -ENODATA && node->acpi.uid == 0)
> >                         break;
> 
> ?
> 
> With that fixed,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>

Thanks!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko