Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 8 Sep 2022 16:37:52 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
        devel@acpica.org
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Elie Morisse <syniurge@gmail.com>,
        Nehal Shah <nehal-bakulchandra.shah@amd.com>,
        Shyam Sundar S K <shyam-sundar.s-k@amd.com>,
        Khalil Blaiech <kblaiech@nvidia.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>,
        Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>,
        Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>,
        Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] ACPI: unify _UID handling as integer
Message-ID: <YxnwMLvgQAPOkeeK@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20220908132910.62122-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220908132910.62122-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 04:29:02PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> This series is about unification on how we handle ACPI _UID when
> it's known to be an integer-in-the-string.
> 
> The idea of merging either all via ACPI tree, or taking ACPI stuff
> for the v6.1 while the rest may be picked up later on by respective
> maintainers separately

>(currently all depends on Wolfram, other
> patches have got the tags from the maintainers).

I stand corrected, the perf patch is not tagged yet.

> Partially compile-tested (x86-64).

Forgot to mention that there is a new user of this API is pending:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/20220908072621.3415957-1-jay.xu@rock-chips.com/

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko