Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To:     Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>, will@kernel.org,
        mark.rutland@arm.com, arnd@arndb.de
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arm64: run softirqs on the per-CPU IRQ stack
Date:   Thu,  8 Sep 2022 19:34:32 +0100
Message-Id: <166266206917.232050.13406365654648397230.b4-ty@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220815124739.15948-1-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
References: <20220815124739.15948-1-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 15 Aug 2022 20:47:39 +0800, Qi Zheng wrote:
> Currently arm64 supports per-CPU IRQ stack, but softirqs
> are still handled in the task context.
> 
> Since any call to local_bh_enable() at any level in the task's
> call stack may trigger a softirq processing run, which could
> potentially cause a task stack overflow if the combined stack
> footprints exceed the stack's size, let's run these softirqs
> on the IRQ stack as well.
> 
> [...]

Applied to arm64 (for-next/misc), thanks!

[1/1] arm64: run softirqs on the per-CPU IRQ stack
      https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/2d2f3bb897a3

-- 
Catalin