Received: by 2002:a05:6358:489b:b0:bb:da1:e618 with SMTP id x27csp1143822rwn; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 14:16:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR5lfw1vTFEDAjquGQL5/sYAJP15Ih4hD3G7bPf4LtftbmNPbIOpuVerNmsteP3jmvy6Wb51 X-Received: by 2002:a63:5852:0:b0:438:6d70:228d with SMTP id i18-20020a635852000000b004386d70228dmr2443127pgm.485.1662671797011; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 14:16:37 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1662671797; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=00+UMB94AawmFKdz3nXxI3rGf8fq5WSZRGm/igQsUwntDFVCTPaksE6gZqi3AV8fl6 whDlE6yXG+Jea7OYA8TZb3GTzta3+2HhMPW5y9RfuSsyNKzhBX+z240hkapFMk7FcOAb wg1c/r2p5zoxltHFVLh81upYETtvPr+dzLSElNQCIbGsrzBGtP42SPq3uZ3B3Z8XfeP8 V2NXeTuoqiKt7GGNc/2yOvyp2c6f3L/JEJlAaJ6vC4bQpyfyDrgduXzX0dXU3ZBtQc+e cPoXrSRfoW/jO2wCqvNpSkUdDiBpwI74MrvTQguMr36zdc37GVQVei0Ny2Vy9YdIIouU 8bfw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=vaR+PRR/c8VGDxG3pWSaeOmzf/CHklELeimE/+fWPMY=; b=mq/CRLtyFM6ycmhEhWm9a1IQuFarVfuAJ8Ro9LrF27JfVHvaFXEYndW1LLhGQDpRAc 7C18+P+ZCUNJXLjWZyDahiDNEcA6Q62LYqIouwRCEuY20Vx7FbXDHV0jAXukLeKij7yk OGj0LiD0wdRalaygnDXy3BSc+8SaHZHB0YVGTp+vyWg8qDUEHiN1PWWxW9zbO19k/l3p XNC5WlfrnTuEyh5wxSh8WA+NQt3K8dj9QtwmMNI10s6jTHi5zjiNj1M6CD/IU3eVUSgW eA0yf4QvoCyYUDue/jqu31GEf3o+vIQO33tOD8xwEhzO3TR+Cgi3E31JNBYO+BF01CLj LkNw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=lCAHHHtG; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q204-20020a632ad5000000b0041c5b90f8cbsi22091852pgq.850.2022.09.08.14.16.26; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 14:16:36 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=lCAHHHtG; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229800AbiIHUcs (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 8 Sep 2022 16:32:48 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46762 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229754AbiIHUcr (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Sep 2022 16:32:47 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x430.google.com (mail-wr1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::430]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A0C1F02AD for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 13:32:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x430.google.com with SMTP id t14so20869277wrx.8 for ; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 13:32:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=vaR+PRR/c8VGDxG3pWSaeOmzf/CHklELeimE/+fWPMY=; b=lCAHHHtGrq9cNEZkhFfMbtPxHscDK7s0S4yHqSiFF3nde/Kclq1HENHQQhVHeUt9Yj D/9+fdKfsyfKL3ZSZntsRfDnls3ySehyrEFIyUYVB5xt7JACTP/dkpVza+mmKUvv2FKq oPDBxtsu1GQFlk0Rt+PqICrAQ1shTZq0nXN24wPlw6Aum6LGRiGShk3pLvhytTx2Y1fz UXLNaDng7ZEiYEUBVwbARxTMEvShiKmkHJ0DjHqynta2OncqVGAGUomZZYvL2B4KxOS0 5JC1hJkVwLq/cwbHpzgru3X55StUYRb9OEezfeaoevF5Ba8NAaF7CiEn9cppS4+T/Na/ KuBw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=vaR+PRR/c8VGDxG3pWSaeOmzf/CHklELeimE/+fWPMY=; b=63ZSCyRSHxx1h6dPXHjWeRmLShGjYNAzFwxRIcPhe8n7FBSecq/3Ddlz1OXrRgD7iG 8mdwqoEUuTtjDqCIdoLI5niS8D3/u7raLWGsF8VcFFi38GwDf6oWBIuv4kO80HgWjEKy Qiz4To6CuvZX4XOZoEMk7tHkpk6PiVg1yvR4PDLCfee/Z28mmxs6KQNUIzGzmLpFswGM 0XrpiwTjuOZzPNslceCVmXl3MJdm25FmdSTEHcoFkejbI1vPxQQPLgl/7uebc1n9GxwW WesUn8vLjrmoXeZusKSLIVZdNfH6rl8USgLVdsYYA+eNYGmn2zYL0PTBB9kYCw+HQObO UZOg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1ypZhU4sktJ98fM+dEWp8ZusiLbcow9x5Su9R/CAWkWtJMwwSl TC8XShaE2gGZ2kL4JQQ+Ot2cb5P44m39fE3DowTi3e5Ccrs= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:168e:b0:220:87da:c3e4 with SMTP id y14-20020a056000168e00b0022087dac3e4mr6000203wrd.559.1662669163591; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 13:32:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1662519715-21891-1-git-send-email-shengjiu.wang@nxp.com> In-Reply-To: <1662519715-21891-1-git-send-email-shengjiu.wang@nxp.com> From: Nicolin Chen Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 13:32:32 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: fsl_asrc: Add initialization finishing check in runtime resume To: Shengjiu Wang Cc: Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com, festevam@gmail.com, shengjiu.wang@gmail.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 8:20 PM Shengjiu Wang wrote: > > If the initialization is not finished, then filling input data to > the FIFO may fail. So it is better to add initialization finishing > check in the runtime resume for suspend & resume case. > > And consider the case of three instances working in parallel, > increase the retry times to 50 for more initialization time. > > Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang Some nitpicks inline. Otherwise, Reviewed-by: Nicolin Chen > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ > > #define IDEAL_RATIO_DECIMAL_DEPTH 26 > #define DIVIDER_NUM 64 > +#define INIT_TRY_NUM 50 s/TRY/RETRY > @@ -592,6 +593,10 @@ static void fsl_asrc_start_pair(struct fsl_asrc_pair *pair) > reg &= ASRCFG_INIRQi_MASK(index); > } while (!reg && --retry); > > + /* NOTE: Doesn't treat initialization timeout as error */ s/as error/as an error > + if (!retry) > + dev_warn(&asrc->pdev->dev, "initialization isn't finished\n"); Could print which pair; or perhaps pair_warn? > @@ -1295,6 +1301,20 @@ static int fsl_asrc_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) > regmap_update_bits(asrc->regmap, REG_ASRCTR, > ASRCTR_ASRCEi_ALL_MASK, asrctr); > > + /* Wait for status of initialization for every enabled pairs */ s/every/all > + do { > + udelay(5); > + regmap_read(asrc->regmap, REG_ASRCFG, ®); > + reg = (reg >> ASRCFG_INIRQi_SHIFT(0)) & 0x7; > + } while ((reg != ((asrctr >> ASRCTR_ASRCEi_SHIFT(0)) & 0x7)) && --retry); > + > + /* > + * NOTE: Doesn't treat initialization timeout as error s/as error/as an error/ > + * Some of pair maybe success, then still can continue. + * Some of the pairs may succeed, then still can continue. > + */ > + if (!retry) > + dev_warn(dev, "initialization isn't finished\n"); Could print which pair.