Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 14:14:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 14:12:36 -0500 Received: from dsl254-112-233.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.254.112.233]:3253 "EHLO snark.thyrsus.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 14:12:16 -0500 Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 14:04:12 -0500 From: "Eric S. Raymond" To: Rik van Riel Cc: Giacomo Catenazzi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [kbuild-devel] Converting the 2.5 kernel to kbuild 2.5 Message-ID: <20011204140412.B24431@thyrsus.com> Reply-To: esr@thyrsus.com Mail-Followup-To: "Eric S. Raymond" , Rik van Riel , Giacomo Catenazzi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <20011204123620.I16578@thyrsus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from riel@conectiva.com.br on Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 05:03:06PM -0200 Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rik van Riel : > Ohhh, that sounds a lot like "I'm not the maintainer, I'm > not responsible for the code I submit" ;))) I will provide stable code and be responsible for its stability. It will be Marcelo's call, not mine, on whether the strategic tradeoffs come out in favor of the back-port. -- Eric S. Raymond Everything you know is wrong. But some of it is a useful first approximation. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/