Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <679d8f0c-f8cc-d43e-5467-c32a78bcb850@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 9 Sep 2022 09:46:21 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.9.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Move numa_balancing sysctls to its own file
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
CC:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20220908072531.87916-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
 <YxqDa+WALRr8L7Q8@bombadil.infradead.org>
From:   Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <YxqDa+WALRr8L7Q8@bombadil.infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk


On 2022/9/9 8:06, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 03:25:31PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>> The sysctl_numa_balancing_promote_rate_limit and sysctl_numa_balancing
>> are part of sched, move them to its own file.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
> There is quite a bit of random cleanup on each kernel release
> for sysctls to do things like what you just did. Because of this it has its
> own tree to help avoid conflicts. Can you base your patches on the
> sysctl-testing branch here and re-submit:

Found this when reading memory tiering code，sure to re-submit based your 
branch,

thanks.

>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mcgrof/linux.git/log/?h=sysctl-testing
>
> If testing goes fine, then I'd move this to sysctl-next which linux-next
> picks up for yet more testing.
>
> Are scheduling folks OK with this patch and me picking it up on the
> sysctl-next tree if all tests are a go?
>
>    Luis
> .