Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220906033957.4377-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com> <20220909073509.301363-1-naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
 <51e6ea21-8af4-775d-1561-6671cfc50ecf@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <51e6ea21-8af4-775d-1561-6671cfc50ecf@linaro.org>
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 9 Sep 2022 17:54:11 +0530
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYv79_BrWT28DVfu4JHasiOKMeL-Wr_MJapU5xeB5VomBA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: enable ARCH_BCM
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc:     f.fainelli@gmail.com, andersson@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
        biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
        dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org, geert+renesas@glider.be,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com, michael@walle.cc, shawnguo@kernel.org,
        soc@kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org, will@kernel.org,
        lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
        Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>,
        Benjamin Copeland <ben.copeland@linaro.org>,
        Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 9 Sept 2022 at 13:08, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 09/09/2022 09:35, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > From: Naresh kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
> >
> >
> > On 2022-09-05 20:39, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >> Commit 96796c914b84 ("arm64: Kconfig.platforms: Re-organized Broadcom
> >> menu") introduced a new symbol ARCH_BCM and made all of the Broadcom
> >> SoCs Kconfig depend on it, but did not enable it in the defconfig.
> >> Thus, now the defconfig doesn't include support for any Broadcom
> >> architectures anymore. Fix it.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 96796c914b84 ("arm64: Kconfig.platforms: Re-organized Broadcom menu")
> >> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> >
> > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
>
> The patch was sent on 6th of September. Your report on 8th of September...

Understood !
Maybe off-topic,
Testing Linux next seems to be a bit late to report the regressions.
Our testing would have build and boot test devicetree/for-next or
devicetree / master branches to find early regressions.
or Any other well known maintainers trees.

Your suggestions are most welcome for improving Linux kernel quality.

Best regards
Naresh Kamboju

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof