Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764016AbXFRPhk (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:37:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755871AbXFRPhd (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:37:33 -0400 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:48809 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754363AbXFRPhc (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:37:32 -0400 Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 16:43:10 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: Marek Wawrzyczny Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 Message-ID: <20070618164310.0d279195@the-village.bc.nu> In-Reply-To: <200706190005.28700.marekw1977@yahoo.com.au> References: <1182156596l.29108l.0l@ecxwww1.reanet.de> <200706190005.28700.marekw1977@yahoo.com.au> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.1 (GTK+ 2.10.8; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Organization: Red Hat UK Cyf., Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, Y Deyrnas Gyfunol. Cofrestrwyd yng Nghymru a Lloegr o'r rhif cofrestru 3798903 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1590 Lines: 34 > IANAL but I think a second, probably fictional but not unrealistic scenario. A > Linux-based in-car entertainment system. I believe there are laws in certain > countries that require the front screens to be off when the car is in motion > to prevent the driver from being distracted. Yes - and in others you must meet certain approvals. > Assume that the hardware does not prevent the user from uploading modified > software (with the restriction removed) and the user modified the system and > then causes a crash with fatalities. Then providing the modification was not utterly trivial, or the user was warned, or it would have been obvious to the person making the mods that it was a bad idea whoever made the mods will get pasted > I imagine there are countries where a civil case could be brought against the > manufacturer for failing to provide reasonable safeguards against disabling > the safety feature. Unlikely. Even in the stupidly litigious world of "Warning: Kitchen knife is sharp" if you modify something you usually get the blame - some exceptions being those where the mod is obvious, trivial and apparently safe. (oh and for the UK and I guess much of the rest of the EU if you fiddle with a safety check and remove it and someone gets hurt you can face criminal charges up to and including manslaughter) Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/