Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932206AbXFRPq4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:46:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756676AbXFRPqs (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:46:48 -0400 Received: from keil-draco.com ([216.193.185.50]:50667 "EHLO mail.keil-draco.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757566AbXFRPqr (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:46:47 -0400 From: Daniel Hazelton To: Anders Larsen Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:46:33 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: Alexandre Oliva , Ingo Molnar , Alan Cox , Linus Torvalds , Greg KH , debian developer , david@lang.hm, Tarkan Erimer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton References: <1182156596l.29108l.0l@ecxwww1.reanet.de> In-Reply-To: <1182156596l.29108l.0l@ecxwww1.reanet.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706181146.33844.dhazelton@enter.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1691 Lines: 44 On Monday 18 June 2007 04:49:56 Anders Larsen wrote: > On Sat, 16 Jun 2007 22:54:56 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > I don't know any law that requires tivoization. > > Not exactly laws, but pretty close: > > Credit-card payment terminals are subject to strict security > certification, where it has to be ensured that > > a) the user cannot tinker with the device without rendering it unusable > for its original purpose (electronic payments), and > > b) the manufacturer is able to update the device _in_ _the_ _field_. > > Those are hard requirements imposed by the banks and credit-card companies. > > We _are_ allowed to disclose the source code (and we do, of course) so > that it can be used for other purposes, and of course the user can modify > it. But there's just no way she would be (legally) able to run the > modified software in the same device for the original purpose. And with the current laws it wouldn't just be the user that is charged with a crime, but the company. For "Facilitating the commission of a crime". (btw, that is how, in the US, companies that provide "Full Automatic" conversion kits are prosecuted. (You can't be touched for providing instructions on how to do it - "Freedom of Speech" and all that, but...) DRH > With the (current draft of) GPLv3 we could not legally use Linux on such > devices. > > Cheers > Anders -- Dialup is like pissing through a pipette. Slow and excruciatingly painful. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/