Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 9 Sep 2022 18:25:20 -0700
From:   Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To:     Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
        Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-input <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Limonciello, Mario" <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
        Tim Van Patten <timvp@google.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>,
        "open list:I2C SUBSYSTEM HOST DRIVERS" <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] i2c: acpi: Use ACPI GPIO wake capability bit to set
 wake_irq
Message-ID: <YxvngIKCXUieZfxC@google.com>
References: <20220830231541.1135813-1-rrangel@chromium.org>
 <20220830171332.4.I8af4282adc72eb9f247adcd03676a43893a020a6@changeid>
 <YxftNQrRx3fwsobk@google.com>
 <CAHQZ30DPmn1hN+xfck7CgOGLcze0jtHxxWnq7yVVL0Q_DzG6UQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <98559c23-cc22-3b85-2102-0cc760240804@redhat.com>
 <CAHQZ30ACZ-1UtgbXwEc+tFRvW-KpDg87Q4nj5Dwysz2BB26yiQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJZ5v0iyF98fBgGFyvj_huVkyKvn4O0_WhA=-wC2VCG6A4DdjQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHQZ30DY9aYBoW303qW+hkegYV0BbKFO6LkCuHKnHNxZ3QoLYw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHQZ30DY9aYBoW303qW+hkegYV0BbKFO6LkCuHKnHNxZ3QoLYw@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 12:47:11PM -0600, Raul Rangel wrote:
> It looks like `i2c_acpi_get_irq` and `platform_get_irq_optional` are
> doing pretty much the same thing. Can we replace `i2c_acpi_get_irq`
> and switch over to `platform_get_irq_optional`? Is it possible to get
> a `platform_device` from an `i2c_client`?

No, they are completely different objects.


		struct device
	/		|		\
platform_device		i2c_client	spi_device ...

Also, please no top-posting on kernel mailing lists.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry