Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sun, 11 Sep 2022 10:52:15 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] iio: adc: mxs-lradc-adc: Get rid of OF specifics
Message-ID: <20220911105215.72bd79f3@jic23-huawei>
In-Reply-To: <YxdM1KUFcdVlnKuO@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20220530173324.921-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
        <20220603181006.2c5cc6c4@jic23-huawei>
        <20220620204225.34d40a3f@jic23-huawei>
        <YxdM1KUFcdVlnKuO@smile.fi.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 6 Sep 2022 16:36:20 +0300
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 08:42:25PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Fri, 3 Jun 2022 18:10:06 +0100
> > Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote: =20
> > > On Mon, 30 May 2022 20:33:24 +0300
> > > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > >  =20
> > > > First of all, the additional conversion from vIRQ, and this is exac=
tly
> > > > what is returned by platform_get_irq_byname(), to vIRQ is not neede=
d.   =20
> > > Confusing sentence form.  Perhaps:
> > >=20
> > > First, the additional conversion from vIRQ (returned by platform_get_=
irq_byname())
> > > to vIRQ is not needed.
> > >  =20
> > > > Hence, drop no-op call to irq_of_parse_and_map().
> > > >=20
> > > > Second, assign the firmware node instead of of_node. =20
>=20
> ...
>=20
> > > Seems sensible to me, but I'd like a sanity check from someone more
> > > familiar with this driver. =20
> >=20
> > This one has been outstanding for a few weeks. I'd still like
> > an Ack or similar form someone who knows this device well.
> >=20
> > If no one has looked at it in a week or so I'll just go with
> > my judgement and pick it up. =20
>=20
> Any news on this one? Maybe I need to resend with the better commit messa=
ge?
>=20

=46rom glancing back at the thread, looks like you said you were going to send
a v2 with property.h include.  I think the rest of the thread is concerned
with a different issue entirely.

Jonathan