DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id:from;
        b=nTTkbv0zU03XUSRvUS3jhi7xjEa19DGbImASPuZPfJ5GSaDBYVHk2ht+o0nlT1X79dlSBumo30Dq79Dndewz1A8ZUSbqBjTstHH+mq/71hjGvNMtLderTQYob5JspQfoYesPnzb8LsIMx4ZInIMP5k9g75W9GwqkD2GqmPVb0uY=
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: GPLv3 dispute solution - new open source license?
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 18:07:53 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200706181807.53306.yurimxpxman@gmail.com>
From: Joshua David Williams <yurimxpxman.lkml@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 745
Lines: 19

On 6/18/07, Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com> wrote:

>  Now, writing yet another license for the linux kernel is
>  therefore NOT the solution - if you get my drift.

The new license could be written to be compatible with both versions of the 
GPL. IMO, a new license written from the OSS perspective would behoove us 
greatly in that we are no longer subject to this Higher Calling of the FSF 
and the Church of Emacs.

$0.02

-- 
It's a commonly known fact that most intruders come in through Windows.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/