Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765665AbXFRW2X (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jun 2007 18:28:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1764027AbXFRW2Q (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jun 2007 18:28:16 -0400 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:32889 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763210AbXFRW2P (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jun 2007 18:28:15 -0400 Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 23:28:06 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Alexandre Oliva , Bernd Schmidt , Alan Cox , Ingo Molnar , Daniel Hazelton , Greg KH , debian developer , david@lang.hm, Tarkan Erimer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 Message-ID: <20070618222806.GJ21478@ftp.linux.org.uk> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 856 Lines: 16 On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 02:09:13PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Quite frankly, I don't *want* to attract develpers that are not > technically "up to snuff". And if you think that making the technically > worse decisions is the "rigth decision", then hey, you're clearly not in > the same technical quality range as I am, or Al Viro is. You are confusing being generally fucked in head (aka being a true believer) with being willing to go for technically worse decisions *when* *it* *comes* *to* *making* *them*. Which would be in gcc-related work in this case. I don't see any evidence of the latter... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/