Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 15:06:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 15:04:58 -0500 Received: from khan.acc.umu.se ([130.239.18.139]:26549 "EHLO khan.acc.umu.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 15:03:43 -0500 Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 21:03:34 +0100 From: David Weinehall To: Dave Jones Cc: "Eric S. Raymond" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Keith Owens , kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, torvalds@transmeta.com Subject: Re: [kbuild-devel] Converting the 2.5 kernel to kbuild 2.5 Message-ID: <20011204210334.J360@khan.acc.umu.se> In-Reply-To: <20011204204822.H360@khan.acc.umu.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: ; from davej@suse.de on Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 08:53:11PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 08:53:11PM +0100, Dave Jones wrote: > On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, David Weinehall wrote: > > > "So anyone happy with an older distro that didn't ship gcc-2.95.x, x > 2 > > gets screwed when they want to build a newer kernel. Nice." > > The difference being that recommended compiler versions don't > change midway through a stable series. Neither should any other > part of the buildtools. AFAIK, changes to the required versions of userland-tools wouldn't during a stable release happen ever-so-often. I can agree that it wouldn't be ideal to introduce a completely new requirement, though. A C-version of CML2-configurator would be a nice solution here. But, I'm fairly confident that Marcello will make the right decisions on his own. /David _ _ // David Weinehall /> Northern lights wander \\ // Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel // Dance across the winter sky // \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/