Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of amd.com designates
 165.204.84.17 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com;
 client-ip=165.204.84.17; helo=SATLEXMB04.amd.com; pr=C
From:   Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
To:     <rafael@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
CC:     <catalin@antebit.com>, <philipp.zabel@gmail.com>,
        <travisghansen@yahoo.com>, <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>,
        Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
        Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/6] acpi/x86: s2idle: Move _HID handling for AMD systems into structures
Date:   Mon, 12 Sep 2022 12:23:55 -0500
Message-ID: <20220912172401.22301-2-mario.limonciello@amd.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220912172401.22301-1-mario.limonciello@amd.com>
References: <20220912172401.22301-1-mario.limonciello@amd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Sep 2022 17:24:00.0987
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 618164bf-41f1-4759-d312-08da94e394d1
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d;Ip=[165.204.84.17];Helo=[SATLEXMB04.amd.com]
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BN8NAM11FT115.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BL1PR12MB5189
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
        DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
        RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE
        autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Right now the information about which cases to use for what are in a
comment, but this is error prone.  Instead move all information into
a dedicated structure.

Tested-by: catalin@antebit.com
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c b/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c
index f9ac12b778e6..a7757551f750 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c
@@ -363,6 +363,39 @@ static int validate_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const char *uuid, int rev, guid_t *d
 	return ret;
 }
 
+struct amd_lps0_hid_device_data {
+	const unsigned int rev_id;
+	const bool check_off_by_one;
+	const bool prefer_amd_guid;
+};
+
+static const struct amd_lps0_hid_device_data amd_picasso = {
+	.rev_id = 0,
+	.check_off_by_one = true,
+	.prefer_amd_guid = false,
+};
+
+static const struct amd_lps0_hid_device_data amd_cezanne = {
+	.rev_id = 0,
+	.check_off_by_one = false,
+	.prefer_amd_guid = false,
+};
+
+static const struct amd_lps0_hid_device_data amd_rembrandt = {
+	.rev_id = 2,
+	.check_off_by_one = false,
+	.prefer_amd_guid = true,
+};
+
+static const struct acpi_device_id amd_hid_ids[] = {
+	{"AMD0004",	(kernel_ulong_t)&amd_picasso,	},
+	{"AMD0005",	(kernel_ulong_t)&amd_picasso,	},
+	{"AMDI0005",	(kernel_ulong_t)&amd_picasso,	},
+	{"AMDI0006",	(kernel_ulong_t)&amd_cezanne,	},
+	{"AMDI0007",	(kernel_ulong_t)&amd_rembrandt,	},
+	{}
+};
+
 static int lps0_device_attach(struct acpi_device *adev,
 			      const struct acpi_device_id *not_used)
 {
@@ -370,31 +403,27 @@ static int lps0_device_attach(struct acpi_device *adev,
 		return 0;
 
 	if (acpi_s2idle_vendor_amd()) {
-		/* AMD0004, AMD0005, AMDI0005:
-		 * - Should use rev_id 0x0
-		 * - function mask > 0x3: Should use AMD method, but has off by one bug
-		 * - function mask = 0x3: Should use Microsoft method
-		 * AMDI0006:
-		 * - should use rev_id 0x0
-		 * - function mask = 0x3: Should use Microsoft method
-		 * AMDI0007:
-		 * - Should use rev_id 0x2
-		 * - Should only use AMD method
-		 */
-		const char *hid = acpi_device_hid(adev);
-		rev_id = strcmp(hid, "AMDI0007") ? 0 : 2;
+		static const struct acpi_device_id *dev_id;
+		const struct amd_lps0_hid_device_data *data;
+
+		for (dev_id = &amd_hid_ids[0]; dev_id->id[0]; dev_id++)
+			if (acpi_dev_hid_uid_match(adev, dev_id->id, NULL))
+				break;
+		if (dev_id != NULL)
+			data = (const struct amd_lps0_hid_device_data *) dev_id->driver_data;
+		else
+			return 0;
+		rev_id = data->rev_id;
 		lps0_dsm_func_mask = validate_dsm(adev->handle,
 					ACPI_LPS0_DSM_UUID_AMD, rev_id, &lps0_dsm_guid);
 		lps0_dsm_func_mask_microsoft = validate_dsm(adev->handle,
 					ACPI_LPS0_DSM_UUID_MICROSOFT, 0,
 					&lps0_dsm_guid_microsoft);
-		if (lps0_dsm_func_mask > 0x3 && (!strcmp(hid, "AMD0004") ||
-						 !strcmp(hid, "AMD0005") ||
-						 !strcmp(hid, "AMDI0005"))) {
+		if (lps0_dsm_func_mask > 0x3 && data->check_off_by_one) {
 			lps0_dsm_func_mask = (lps0_dsm_func_mask << 1) | 0x1;
 			acpi_handle_debug(adev->handle, "_DSM UUID %s: Adjusted function mask: 0x%x\n",
 					  ACPI_LPS0_DSM_UUID_AMD, lps0_dsm_func_mask);
-		} else if (lps0_dsm_func_mask_microsoft > 0 &&
+		} else if (lps0_dsm_func_mask_microsoft > 0 && data->prefer_amd_guid &&
 				(!strcmp(hid, "AMDI0007") ||
 				 !strcmp(hid, "AMDI0008"))) {
 			lps0_dsm_func_mask_microsoft = -EINVAL;
-- 
2.34.1