Received: by 2002:a05:6358:489b:b0:bb:da1:e618 with SMTP id x27csp5646499rwn; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 12:08:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR63lB00U/hD99DGrccOZ49VsxHhCQN4qOImmpGCktcop0S1Zju2PCy5vxJIr+OzqUfLoPZL X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:a067:b0:77b:9672:3f83 with SMTP id ia7-20020a170907a06700b0077b96723f83mr7513093ejc.523.1663009709766; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 12:08:29 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1663009709; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dqUOUyoTYNftvGBdCGGzbwCTzpoBz7tSaXokJJgkxB67SnNRqg5mbsHddZfNJkhulw v3zE8T27uZxfi0YCtnN3OKoPNdVOoli14m1FpOIU7AwPcPocoU40BZBBb9vyMy52Xr17 PFS6COxkEAFzzSjWmbpypEJhcveS186po8JrmHszmuYnuLpcqIZWEGh0Sdfr2YXe0m/i YNHSJGx2JSUZsri/U5kOiCuk/CMRpAtdFMwywvvNEM+UI+EMchtSsH1wonoCTnr4RjFL HlQOcLsel1XWKc1m9hAJQNQEyBhcLHumqOK9LVXXYLnpvKTKkWUrI5d+4i50HIE7SDNI CqcQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:dkim-signature; bh=x3dhgBdfZpa2wxUdiBs2W11ZyoCSSU9/WrWzizXcRIs=; b=Ju5HMO74gBEWOpT9ebVQeFwNq/Ebu/1QeMkPUWtlvAzkYkt94wrx/kAiMzXZH99Bqm gkQi1vA3fzFWt1O5twjwb6U6slQ3u5jPDjr+dra8jczElYMrFN6UpoCeQn3lvZJ0sFET UP7oer4lcL/LwNsXR1V5c0ZCBDA+4713PTRn5Ja8cZ8JCfYfDrRdUm3LOQcHUQhPM7QC QDggF1FfQY1RefrG50kj+/GuJBMX60cIxre+oSZsjq/oG2tChU0oS8sBkDjxrso6SYqk TQ1aTjfUKsxS9Fzw7lipeEtZb6ZyT526P1Ox0RoTCTHYMG+cccf6uyCxcNswAMJh8L4V LnXg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b="EwswG/jw"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t23-20020a508d57000000b0044e6e22c4aesi4961360edt.284.2022.09.12.12.08.04; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 12:08:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b="EwswG/jw"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230112AbiILSox (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 12 Sep 2022 14:44:53 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33080 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229715AbiILSov (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Sep 2022 14:44:51 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x632.google.com (mail-pl1-x632.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::632]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1780112A84; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 11:44:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x632.google.com with SMTP id x1so9431677plv.5; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 11:44:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=x3dhgBdfZpa2wxUdiBs2W11ZyoCSSU9/WrWzizXcRIs=; b=EwswG/jwo90VzzM/Zj4fKy/aMwfPc470pwVa0b2up97FtV6VzgaKXs9ktEnKxp4zhe 1keqGVQeJSXpCk2Nk5d2CEaRAU+lBDBvLN+0GDJI5IjBUqv+WLpBfAK111fcCpdBCuhM 6iGlcWenbBsdIbEu1NnUwdHxoUJt5sqJ4pOt+mM/VBKyEdpyA7MxX3P7VxeM7kq6vgAr QuU0cAy0Pe7srYx6QAcog7RyebNFXHXLwMuJHXzBaZKfUltnnSVCvPgkUQk4ebZMj+Dz nngXu4juLdeDzIomVE9Q2k9jyJBhIwnswp0zoNGLbu2A9d2LpVqK6PkCdgKBrf/wzuMN +mqA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date; bh=x3dhgBdfZpa2wxUdiBs2W11ZyoCSSU9/WrWzizXcRIs=; b=QPCoUKyAbscl1x9Jtu4tkO3upyAQry7xpxm3k1wIYbfJuQFMnh+dgg7gA2l22yVKpU G2+E+lTu3nJ8Pml1BMAHLUv9RmvYcvmwA+LrguLwMV4jck5A5Kwl+UpbisR7xPzIY0Nk 4CEtT10KZEfDZZR7n8/fHvde48vm+C+Q/LmmC4JG4xAItoX6uppPH4bfeHQfsxq9gV2X DRk8TqBc/gTMFBF/6OxK8VNTrMV6hbQ2Egd/luI7Hp1gAeXXxsIHXRm7lxekJS3aTwQo eoIEEa+Xr6OBmItbEAgu5wceVqZ3XnGahAfMuKE9cJeakdh0JF7+HsdCEDtQ8HnnaND9 8i/g== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2W8s+E6mcWCEGoJSnytKegmO5j/DTjngCYJFeHQaUyYSoDcJEP tYS7wMvMTSO8XQqFPfErJCaF2aiFQKM= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:390a:b0:202:c913:2216 with SMTP id ob10-20020a17090b390a00b00202c9132216mr7720633pjb.5.1663008290301; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 11:44:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (2603-800c-1a02-1bae-a7fa-157f-969a-4cde.res6.spectrum.com. [2603:800c:1a02:1bae:a7fa:157f:969a:4cde]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 38-20020a631666000000b0041d95d805d6sm5962077pgw.57.2022.09.12.11.44.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 12 Sep 2022 11:44:49 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Tejun Heo Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 08:44:48 -1000 From: Tejun Heo To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Chengming Zhou , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the cgroup tree Message-ID: References: <20220912161812.072aaa3b@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 09:38:58AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 04:18:12PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > After merging the cgroup tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > Hmm,. TJ should I base sched/psi on top of drivers-core-next and your > cgroup tree? Yeah, this is kinda nasty. Lemme just pull drivers-core-next into cgorup/for-6.1 so that folks don't have to worry about this and you can just pull that one. Thanks. -- tejun