Received: by 2002:a05:6358:489b:b0:bb:da1:e618 with SMTP id x27csp5794090rwn; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 14:36:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6vL9pdTJIxVM38YY6ed/dkydjuo1flwJXufgwJezTEW+WBKGbpuoHNafJF390rN7NUSNV7 X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7249:b0:77a:1198:f210 with SMTP id ds9-20020a170907724900b0077a1198f210mr11865890ejc.33.1663018559887; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 14:35:59 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1663018559; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=sVWx9f/G6MR+/eRzpooFKZJnJrSIJxR5XW7pp9QL1Cd2X1ES0x6HG4NzYryBXE5+HW 8mwo+slcg0hK39M7AOBxcg4l7KAVh6tnoNwXeP2jjaHbMEW1DWamGDXWRlIB6VaKhT2Q SrYQsweplw3iIlp7Zq+iqtbikII4p76OBQSyDxIwIkbuTWuB7OsrymH0HHj0Z6u3d5vD EFr4OlZvM3qIhA8lrR5QfNPJbkMRzTvmdD0z2mMaNuomcp2EIfwkYpUjVmvCUdKOcH3v Wz2uqF5prXA4Cy2aQHwGckNs2+9ogZzYKYZYBoS3Lu2Xw75XwwNxGinuGFboTKikF74L cAfA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=9Frkg9lzfVBnZdjd0upV+87jFCihKKzw/qEJVDe5OxM=; b=CVtbipVvff/0B9Ff/AwdzkL9ztMaMMMH5pC3zS7rdtY7tyyYrBmmnEdUO9V7Mx5xZa JSodxE/cUfYca8YS9h2y1NKRK6OlTkDpjPNS5DXakqbhzF1WkGA7ho50ZivlqjCdVyAy O8ODnb+AlAB6609M/ZBsU0IYlCZmPDRt3wsHMc+TbJrX2QKEGS/zaKvBT5kYaT/RO12v 6CBAbvnaFYGvx9da8kae+uFjHTlqUnyqCLtWDjlcsCaiJmeBTPDFANj7uOEc1RKtoTTR YNhV76fQAw92SpQqjLGxB0/5hGsQkiQnGzItuYOh38qzOxTe5VskgJa1mKZSDgiI7wJb Oytg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e18-20020a17090658d200b0072f0a9a8e61si8217020ejs.368.2022.09.12.14.35.33; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 14:35:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229931AbiILUhl (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 12 Sep 2022 16:37:41 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36038 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229878AbiILUhg (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Sep 2022 16:37:36 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56CFC49B57; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 13:37:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D2C1113E; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 13:37:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mammon-tx2.austin.arm.com (mammon-tx2.austin.arm.com [10.118.28.62]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EA76D3F73B; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 13:37:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Jeremy Linton To: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: rafael@kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, robert.moore@intel.com, punit.agrawal@bytedance.com, lukasz.luba@arm.com, ionela.voinescu@arm.com, pierre.gondois@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@acpica.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Jeremy Linton Subject: [PATCH v5 1/1] ACPI: CPPC: Disable FIE if registers in PCC regions Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 15:37:22 -0500 Message-Id: <20220912203722.205185-2-jeremy.linton@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.3 In-Reply-To: <20220912203722.205185-1-jeremy.linton@arm.com> References: <20220912203722.205185-1-jeremy.linton@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org PCC regions utilize a mailbox to set/retrieve register values used by the CPPC code. This is fine as long as the operations are infrequent. With the FIE code enabled though the overhead can range from 2-11% of system CPU overhead (ex: as measured by top) on Arm based machines. So, before enabling FIE assure none of the registers used by cppc_get_perf_ctrs() are in the PCC region. Finally, add a module parameter which can override the PCC region detection at boot or module reload. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton Acked-by: Viresh Kumar --- drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---- include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h | 5 ++++ 3 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c index 1e15a9f25ae9..55693e6f7153 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c @@ -1240,6 +1240,48 @@ int cppc_get_perf_caps(int cpunum, struct cppc_perf_caps *perf_caps) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cppc_get_perf_caps); +/** + * cppc_perf_ctrs_in_pcc - Check if any perf counters are in a PCC region. + * + * CPPC has flexibility about how CPU performance counters are accessed. + * One of the choices is PCC regions, which can have a high access latency. This + * routine allows callers of cppc_get_perf_ctrs() to know this ahead of time. + * + * Return: true if any of the counters are in PCC regions, false otherwise + */ +bool cppc_perf_ctrs_in_pcc(void) +{ + int cpu; + + for_each_present_cpu(cpu) { + struct cpc_register_resource *ref_perf_reg; + struct cpc_desc *cpc_desc; + + cpc_desc = per_cpu(cpc_desc_ptr, cpu); + + if (CPC_IN_PCC(&cpc_desc->cpc_regs[DELIVERED_CTR]) || + CPC_IN_PCC(&cpc_desc->cpc_regs[REFERENCE_CTR]) || + CPC_IN_PCC(&cpc_desc->cpc_regs[CTR_WRAP_TIME])) + return true; + + + ref_perf_reg = &cpc_desc->cpc_regs[REFERENCE_PERF]; + + /* + * If reference perf register is not supported then we should + * use the nominal perf value + */ + if (!CPC_SUPPORTED(ref_perf_reg)) + ref_perf_reg = &cpc_desc->cpc_regs[NOMINAL_PERF]; + + if (CPC_IN_PCC(ref_perf_reg)) + return true; + } + + return false; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cppc_perf_ctrs_in_pcc); + /** * cppc_get_perf_ctrs - Read a CPU's performance feedback counters. * @cpunum: CPU from which to read counters. diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c index 24eaf0ec344d..9e2a48ac5830 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c @@ -63,7 +63,15 @@ static struct cppc_workaround_oem_info wa_info[] = { static struct cpufreq_driver cppc_cpufreq_driver; +static enum { + FIE_UNSET = -1, + FIE_ENABLED, + FIE_DISABLED +} fie_disabled = FIE_UNSET; + #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_CPUFREQ_FIE +module_param(fie_disabled, int, 0444); +MODULE_PARM_DESC(fie_disabled, "Disable Frequency Invariance Engine (FIE)"); /* Frequency invariance support */ struct cppc_freq_invariance { @@ -158,7 +166,7 @@ static void cppc_cpufreq_cpu_fie_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) struct cppc_freq_invariance *cppc_fi; int cpu, ret; - if (cppc_cpufreq_driver.get == hisi_cppc_cpufreq_get_rate) + if (fie_disabled) return; for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus) { @@ -199,7 +207,7 @@ static void cppc_cpufreq_cpu_fie_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) struct cppc_freq_invariance *cppc_fi; int cpu; - if (cppc_cpufreq_driver.get == hisi_cppc_cpufreq_get_rate) + if (fie_disabled) return; /* policy->cpus will be empty here, use related_cpus instead */ @@ -229,7 +237,15 @@ static void __init cppc_freq_invariance_init(void) }; int ret; - if (cppc_cpufreq_driver.get == hisi_cppc_cpufreq_get_rate) + if (fie_disabled != FIE_ENABLED && fie_disabled != FIE_DISABLED) { + fie_disabled = FIE_ENABLED; + if (cppc_perf_ctrs_in_pcc()) { + pr_info("FIE not enabled on systems with registers in PCC\n"); + fie_disabled = FIE_DISABLED; + } + } + + if (fie_disabled) return; kworker_fie = kthread_create_worker(0, "cppc_fie"); @@ -247,7 +263,7 @@ static void __init cppc_freq_invariance_init(void) static void cppc_freq_invariance_exit(void) { - if (cppc_cpufreq_driver.get == hisi_cppc_cpufreq_get_rate) + if (fie_disabled) return; kthread_destroy_worker(kworker_fie); @@ -936,6 +952,7 @@ static void cppc_check_hisi_workaround(void) wa_info[i].oem_revision == tbl->oem_revision) { /* Overwrite the get() callback */ cppc_cpufreq_driver.get = hisi_cppc_cpufreq_get_rate; + fie_disabled = FIE_DISABLED; break; } } diff --git a/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h b/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h index f73d357ecdf5..c5614444031f 100644 --- a/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h +++ b/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ extern int cppc_get_perf_ctrs(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs *perf_fb_ctrs); extern int cppc_set_perf(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_ctrls *perf_ctrls); extern int cppc_set_enable(int cpu, bool enable); extern int cppc_get_perf_caps(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_caps *caps); +extern bool cppc_perf_ctrs_in_pcc(void); extern bool acpi_cpc_valid(void); extern bool cppc_allow_fast_switch(void); extern int acpi_get_psd_map(unsigned int cpu, struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data); @@ -173,6 +174,10 @@ static inline int cppc_get_perf_caps(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_caps *caps) { return -ENOTSUPP; } +static inline bool cppc_perf_ctrs_in_pcc(void) +{ + return false; +} static inline bool acpi_cpc_valid(void) { return false; -- 2.37.1