Received: by 2002:a05:6358:489b:b0:bb:da1:e618 with SMTP id x27csp6284404rwn; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 01:40:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR40Io7kUinFDtu15BM0SkPXxQJmElXlOHT9n9lOUB+ZJsTn5Pts2w77UxVGvQB/dSJW8U63 X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:3e89:b0:779:4869:b799 with SMTP id hs9-20020a1709073e8900b007794869b799mr14206220ejc.91.1663058410214; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 01:40:10 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1663058410; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Td4aw6xvuQgRVd4Y2HzwzBST59SlD+mq8CPspTEX5w4fCj/gEDQROUw1iUF+xQRhpv 70VvsOqpL2OoV7vrCW76TrK44u4PJeNLte3IR3CGYbbp+bFBr5lP0yrmN87V0dwVZI2G Sn37UVHJGsD1C4Kl21Fcsjz0DH0RnGpWdGrtMoCrIFtcbaknZHMPchdd3CLDTzzesT+w JtfKNY9kjtLZDSzYjF2EavGB5ZFE8iPe/KkSUkP13ch5MTEeFmad7Z8+PjCLCEGtJenX Kr/OO77/700dKi7Ar6S5q7DUvnDvEITAgJ+nUckNAr95yYp9Aoer9d/pt6b+0wLZQNjV /0DQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=o5fz4I+jeCHgXpS5/IEZbX8OYP0YH3mJV3lLyYIpEp0=; b=JCWNEVqjtKyGb1UE+szk8fr0PTTL3wkkf/eR9jrhAe0cIwNjj2W5MyjeSQ7x7R1NiL 5N90VHH8jpHpG8ZD5EEexiaPoPpVhBDuTpoNCtD5rssQFbZxRMOZ/NaGFUIHIyeTxd6E PaUfP8U+MEKohqAUya+Xa2Cp0rBCUnjnV6cfKtCbGeQlehvE2KaKXI0w8hc5nMIhajbB QO2C7o0SmJaVdogp7cvz3Ha4Bqr3SV7RjvmPv5jIKvBoKyGhs9wSHH8IrPoUPXsDW63I SlZ5MbW3lm4TwQyWlQGTjBj/RnMTDS9yEkoyDNYkYrpoFcMwggEbpJTQgEFbAfaolLx1 6EdA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=wYOEyJsH; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id jg39-20020a170907972700b00706b9787b43si6667462ejc.319.2022.09.13.01.39.44; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 01:40:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=wYOEyJsH; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231458AbiIMIbq (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 13 Sep 2022 04:31:46 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58356 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231444AbiIMIbp (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Sep 2022 04:31:45 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x12a.google.com (mail-lf1-x12a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BF1E32AA6 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 01:31:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id o2so16715955lfc.10 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 01:31:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=o5fz4I+jeCHgXpS5/IEZbX8OYP0YH3mJV3lLyYIpEp0=; b=wYOEyJsHHCTSjLw1WzPnR5cuPD0FCdsqcvzomZVC+nUnpMmAXvermgIgD9XcG7gzC6 U8++mH+Kffmc9iwBFATIOOg7SSib06LYpaSvnfcwPorVw2kLlMMo8pJg66jrxQLFX797 Q3D/y0dUrIKEn0MnxAzbtCQMrKFjQ05fBkiRowggD65eIM6FL6RH4yVkW7vPW0cCElYn SHTDjPTC33dPWeirOCHZ/AVWdvhv/FSe00+vJRPpXguFuUdMFfGfwcAHCrzkbDRmFsDn Nrgc2IsLWyaZK9gO+TWdpFW42EVkf+SvdNZHxHBzkNtr8sBmhEp1MSytUsIQLR3pfKEP eLkg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=o5fz4I+jeCHgXpS5/IEZbX8OYP0YH3mJV3lLyYIpEp0=; b=vaPWz5xhsoJQVrajnwe9NgoEaRa09yR9Bs/AVPDORpql5FDeclY311MVcDSVXDJLiz eil5u1hnr9EXZH7erkrWqohg7u6dpg82JQ2pJpWH88vhcwlPaqBPMynbylMoCSsbuwJZ dkCAHwYlZGPqddz5KpjcFZoYJCFFt+G/uwOXR+dKzby6/rt5Ogea9im2uyFNoZ2eCII4 b4Rzbrv2k03qzHG41IKROzYTZN6NzJYFqPQe+3hjBejfuN8r66PWXprZqoP6MKHDq6Wi 3ktmnOuLR0AtpJAet28ZE0RVc4iVdY8+8qAu5iaFHQBzyK40EGeMmTwC3dkcOfY8Cz38 mAYA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2iSpmLBs21B0k8mn0K9qOw2/L80wAean9vRNlSKkYSVTmectH+ TK8t09jcXYgfiyNu8OvGJpvgd2fdoPjadZ0UMxfNzQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3f0f:b0:498:fad9:db0d with SMTP id y15-20020a0565123f0f00b00498fad9db0dmr6229391lfa.46.1663057902828; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 01:31:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220909130309.25458-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <20220909130309.25458-7-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: From: Vincent Guittot Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 10:31:31 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] sched/fair: Add sched group latency support To: Tejun Heo Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, parth@linux.ibm.com, qais.yousef@arm.com, chris.hyser@oracle.com, valentin.schneider@arm.com, patrick.bellasi@matbug.net, David.Laight@aculab.com, pjt@google.com, pavel@ucw.cz, qperret@google.com, tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com, joshdon@google.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 13 Sept 2022 at 00:18, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Hello, > > On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 03:03:07PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: > > + { > > + .name = "latency", > > + .read_s64 = cpu_latency_read_s64, > > + .write_s64 = cpu_latency_write_s64, > > + }, > > You're still using the nice value here, right? If so, can you please use the > filename "latency.nice" so that it's consistent with "weight.nice"? This cpu.latency is not a nice priority but the signed offset used by the scheduler at wakeup. On previous version you raised concern about having a nice value for cgroup so I removed it for cgroup and directly exposed the latency offset with cpu.latency similarly to the weight that is exposed with cpu.shares. Vincent > > Thanks. > > -- > tejun