Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 15:22:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 15:20:38 -0500 Received: from leeloo.zip.com.au ([203.12.97.48]:26120 "EHLO mangalore.zipworld.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 15:20:21 -0500 Message-ID: <3C0D2FF4.837EEE87@zip.com.au> Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2001 12:20:04 -0800 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.17-pre1 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Phillips CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux/Pro -- clusters In-Reply-To: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Daniel Phillips wrote: > > On December 4, 2001 07:04 pm, Alan Cox wrote: > > > Single additional alloc -> twice as many allocs, two slabs, more cachelines > > > dirty. This was hashed out on fsdevel, though apparently not to everyone's > > > satisfaction. > > > > Al Viro's NFS in generic_ip saved me something like 130K of memory. > > Yes, all of these proposals would do that, by getting away from all inodes > being the same size (basically the size of the ext2 inode). > ext3 is the pig at present. I think Andreas has half-a-patch to move it to generic_ip. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/