Received: by 2002:a05:6358:489b:b0:bb:da1:e618 with SMTP id x27csp6920217rwn; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 10:51:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4pzk4+1Cr3zAlrmw/30P7e4IHPJ5BuYupN2C95/9Z0Ez0s8s+K7MK2t9VIbrgKybHIt/o/ X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:a58c:b0:174:3c97:d9a1 with SMTP id az12-20020a170902a58c00b001743c97d9a1mr32880640plb.22.1663091500537; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 10:51:40 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1663091500; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=vmIqErUjXy3VKdChQtsjY9V+/DYvxjEwPHcBiLb8JngHXtekTcibFa6nXRtQTxgSe1 puysGWZH8vT6LkE6eiaAsQ9JvKveXdCOQ2JppQkfdA5/b4WRyKSUrKvgVwWUsj7DkigR alMogIM5ULoYd0wd02PvXVIcK5K+JVZELe38XDzp/rNEdTX0m4N1JgKAn/S4qLyz5qKH LnYgNX110pAR77ofYPpcBRBvMQ20KRu2y0WGMVUl/6oLZA6imuTiZeTFbDRp9PdqY1+C G20OCDjZP/cy++STMxmPnSKCzHkZf2h9xoS6O7yNm19LbIszg+h0Mhnf+EKzzIQPGIuM N3VA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=zUdIdPmG2MRjF2x9cyqKNxV86gYXL5YDq5SLx6sTiPw=; b=eWpsfoxDAP+X3pV1taq2Hq+DgcN9vIHp3r8ZbQikN7BzvsgNHp0xeQxEvAa6Wnd2Wv KGAzPqrLJSLC6+jPAujzLJZl9l6k3HcufGUaIS9ENp/ClEYmiitXXwRmjWmaOMKpVUae TevzmisnrCTlgY8FMJvDro2VOfexVgd5GVmOw25Y2KWVg2TMi4i9s+yje6CYK8POZCoc AcA2hQtDsBxjbHurSwzoU3qnju0MbxV+xb8HVHsTjoMB7foaww10Hz5L/DEd64O96EDO 54x2T36Ia9rJxicYZg2PU5EqRbOw4le0+/3GVuE3gzlHAA/mmbfj+VxpVKrAbw/ccYaW Qcqw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=GVQSXgc1; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k14-20020aa788ce000000b00537fd74ca6bsi13140698pff.54.2022.09.13.10.51.28; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 10:51:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=GVQSXgc1; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232406AbiIMRMG (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 13 Sep 2022 13:12:06 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51372 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232431AbiIMRLh (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Sep 2022 13:11:37 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A3CE719AD for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 09:00:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43CE6B80F6F for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 15:15:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 95C16C433D6; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 15:15:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1663082129; bh=9574kaSGiUpQ1RKeeeAf7bmjgJV7cpo3A99ptlG2Ccw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=GVQSXgc1SwLvIiJiCD5KSewwiyO4s7/WwES4cFEGdhdMky9qaTLL60W9Vc26N/h9v GHbMU5y75SAmzHJCbiS6FfBkGlbLICQIbmzIBpQnkFzfEhthi68ASmLBPuHJZPbvIu d1usMpJZcffYdQgkkQJrJlMVzwiEhdTNP+i3JP0s= Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 17:15:54 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Olof Johansson Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Rothwell , Saravana Kannan , Linux ARM Mailing List , Shawn Guo , Li Yang Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Driver core changes for 6.0-rc1 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 10:24:43AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 10:23 AM Olof Johansson wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 7:16 AM Greg KH wrote: > > > > > Saravana Kannan (11): > > > PM: domains: Delete usage of driver_deferred_probe_check_state() > > > pinctrl: devicetree: Delete usage of driver_deferred_probe_check_state() > > > net: mdio: Delete usage of driver_deferred_probe_check_state() > > > driver core: Add wait_for_init_devices_probe helper function > > > net: ipconfig: Relax fw_devlink if we need to mount a network rootfs > > > Revert "driver core: Set default deferred_probe_timeout back to 0." > > > driver core: Set fw_devlink.strict=1 by default > > > iommu/of: Delete usage of driver_deferred_probe_check_state() > > > driver core: Delete driver_deferred_probe_check_state() > > > driver core: fw_devlink: Allow firmware to mark devices as best effort > > > of: base: Avoid console probe delay when fw_devlink.strict=1 > > > > The last patch in this list regresses my HoneyComb LX2K (ironically > > the machine I do maintainer work on). It stops PCIe from probing, but > > without a single message indicating why. > > > > The reason seems to be that the iommu-maps property doesn't get > > patched up by my (older) u-boot, and thus isn't a valid reference. > > System works fine without IOMMU, which is how I've ran it for a couple > > of years. > > > > It's also extremely hard to diagnose out of the box because there are > > *no error messages*. And there were no warnings leading up to this > > strict enforcement. > > > > This "feature" seems to have been done backwards. The checks should > > have been running (and not skipped due to the "optional" flag), but > > also not causing errors, just warnings. That would have given users a > > chance to know that this is something that needs to be fixed. > > > > And when you flip the switch, at least report what failed so that > > people don't need to spend a whole night bisecting kernels, please. > > > > Greg, mind reverting just the last one? If I hit this, I presume > > others would too. > > Apologies, wrong patch pointed out. The culprit is "driver core: Set > fw_devlink.strict=1 by default", 71066545b48e42. Is this still an issue in -rc5? A number of patches in the above series was just reverted and hopefully should have resolved the issue you are seeing. thanks, greg k-h