Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 15:40:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 15:39:21 -0500 Received: from abasin.nj.nec.com ([138.15.150.16]:60678 "HELO abasin.nj.nec.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 15:38:34 -0500 From: Sven Heinicke MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15373.13379.382015.406274@abasin.nj.nec.com> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 15:38:27 -0500 (EST) To: Alan Cox Cc: sven@research.nj.nec.com (Sven Heinicke), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: hints at modifying kswapd params in 2.4.16 In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <15373.2398.495306.503255@abasin.nj.nec.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org We have actually moved our code to another Dell 4400 we got at the same time (in theory the same exact same system) and I rebuilt the kernel with the same .config file and I am getting different memory usage patterns. The first system I tried was Red Hat 7.1, it never used more then 2G of cache memory leaving the other 2G free. The other system, Mandrake 8.0, sucks up all the 4G of memory with cache but has not yet shown any signs of thrashing. Though the code has only been running a few hours. Could this be a C compiler issue? Alan Cox writes: > > Does the AC kernel still have the old VM? I really wanna stick the > > the new stuff but but a need a stable system. Older kernels 2.4.8 had > > highmem issues, not the 2.4.16 has kswap issues. > > There's a riel vm patch for 2.4.16 if you want to see if the vm thing is > the problem case > > Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/