Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <ab879545-d4b2-0cd8-3ae2-65f9f2baf2fe@gmail.com> <YyCLm0ws8qsiEcaJ@kroah.com>
In-Reply-To: <YyCLm0ws8qsiEcaJ@kroah.com>
From:   yong w <yongw.pur@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Sep 2022 08:46:15 +0800
Message-ID: <CAOH5QeAUGBshLQdRCWLg9-Q3JvrqROLYW6uWr8a4TBKxwAOPaw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] page_alloc: consider highatomic reserve in watermark fast
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     jaewon31.kim@samsung.com, mhocko@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        wang.yong12@zte.com.cn
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> =E4=BA=8E2022=E5=B9=B49=E6=9C=8813=E6=
=97=A5=E5=91=A8=E4=BA=8C 21:54=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A

>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 09:09:47PM +0800, yong wrote:
> > Hello,
> > This patch is required to be patched in linux-5.4.y and linux-4.19.y.
>
> What is "this patch"?  There is no context here :(
>
Sorry, I forgot to quote the original patch. the patch is as follows

    f27ce0e page_alloc: consider highatomic reserve in watermark fast

> > In addition to that, the following two patches are somewhat related:
> >
> >       3334a45 mm/page_alloc: use ac->high_zoneidx for classzone_idx
> >       9282012 page_alloc: fix invalid watermark check on a negative val=
ue
>
> In what way?  What should be done here by us?
>

I think these two patches should also be merged.

    The classzone_idx  parameter is used in the zone_watermark_fast
functionzone, and 3334a45 use ac->high_zoneidx for classzone_idx.
    "9282012 page_alloc: fix invalid watermark check on a negative
value"  fix f27ce0e introduced issues


> confused,
>
> greg k-h