Received: by 2002:a05:6358:489b:b0:bb:da1:e618 with SMTP id x27csp7332389rwn; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 18:47:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6MoMzm0v1LJTm+NK2ICvknILj+N/kHOJk1yamPZgU0dSZZOHQLasjIvCxxuaxqeMSqdnKt X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:d804:b0:202:f247:91b0 with SMTP id a4-20020a17090ad80400b00202f24791b0mr2223411pjv.8.1663120057254; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 18:47:37 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1663120057; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=tLUkN3wNM6T+9r12+jU4IOgmf+fjkFjXYodRYHWKfPKQvICf+n2E+X8+HLtyTkSEr+ 8e30WYkuJAyuLZnW36r0eVumwlBBBHaetqHL2r2Pwv9uWsatplYxa4aStZU4UD+8aNzr 9DlXjhuKdb5R+0j4rimh7Ztl7gLeZ9uNnzj85oB+w3o2s4/RpH9YurHUseukfdEjLGLm v8t2YUTWEkWEYEg8xDmkpLby9KZhyHrAYQEFt8/wFXtfIbQ39NmZp58+WHHSm74+3w8p yx1EkulXLJwLIwyxUflv68niKEO6chvMLQyfKipyYRLEGIxBR0b4jvDLChMs3ZiSUNXg 2mNw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=R0xP9mkn9eTcl8mt8L4PjMdp63pnlkrFbksosmuWxI4=; b=bWJTvQ7ETnGfzC/CnswHn9LcwvGXuTfg5g5Gw7fls0yu/PIyfw5eYQ1jdSCEgQTjwT wT+3E++IOz/2mrno9J1lAj/eAJpNwTq1On4uHRnqFiwOGgZjsql4PWEN3MRe+vPGdEvq C/wAQhtdTP6dTlTC0YfNW6TL9JBRI4ypmWsQq8hXAiBbuX/crTgj4RrFZcf7DwITau2s 5tdpDhNDZJc8h2fW1qJlU6kr96vNboU86OWn5lB6tH2gzR1Hywi1iRHNtL8jIfKbScUl opJbMDcBcsfSFT5t3/S2u6N4Mon5v/YIXEXVr8morwNVeR5W4LC6kxkWY5uH8gyfAzBZ e6lw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id mu9-20020a17090b388900b001fbbcd6f8eesi15263677pjb.73.2022.09.13.18.47.25; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 18:47:37 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230035AbiINBii (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 13 Sep 2022 21:38:38 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46522 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229773AbiINBiV (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Sep 2022 21:38:21 -0400 Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (dggsgout11.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.51]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4434F6D547; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 18:38:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.67.143]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4MS2xN4mw0zlCl1; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 09:36:40 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.127.227]) by APP2 (Coremail) with SMTP id Syh0CgDHGXOGMCFj24dCAw--.23886S5; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 09:38:16 +0800 (CST) From: Yu Kuai To: song@kernel.org, logang@deltatee.com, guoqing.jiang@linux.dev, pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yukuai3@huawei.com, yukuai1@huaweicloud.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com Subject: [PATCH v2 1/4] md/raid10: cleanup wait_barrier() Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 09:49:11 +0800 Message-Id: <20220914014914.398712-2-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20220914014914.398712-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> References: <20220914014914.398712-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID: Syh0CgDHGXOGMCFj24dCAw--.23886S5 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxGrykJF4fKF4xCFWktFWUurg_yoW5Gw4Upw 43GrW3JrWUAF9xJ398JF48CFyFq393XFWUGFyS93ykJF4jyrZ3Wr93G348KryDCrZ5XFyF qFWSyrZxKw4UtrJanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUU9m14x267AKxVW5JVWrJwAFc2x0x2IEx4CE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0 rVWrJVCq3wAFIxvE14AKwVWUJVWUGwA2048vs2IY020E87I2jVAFwI0_Jr4l82xGYIkIc2 x26xkF7I0E14v26r1I6r4UM28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rwA2F7IY1VAKz4vEj48ve4kI8wA2z4x0 Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_tr0E3s1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr1j6F4UJw A2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26rxl6s0DM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW0oVCq3wAS 0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487Mc02F40EFcxC0VAKzVAqx4xG6I80ewAv7VC0I7IYx2 IY67AKxVWUJVWUGwAv7VC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lOx8S6xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UM4x0 Y48IcxkI7VAKI48JM4x0x7Aq67IIx4CEVc8vx2IErcIFxwCF04k20xvY0x0EwIxGrwCFx2 IqxVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwC20s026c02F40E14v26r1j6r18MI8I3I0E7480Y4vE14v2 6r106r1rMI8E67AF67kF1VAFwI0_Jw0_GFylIxkGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY67 AKxVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Cr1lIxAIcVCF04k26cxKx2IY s7xG6r1j6r1xMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr 0_Gr1UYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x0JUqAp5UUUUU= X-CM-SenderInfo: 51xn3trlr6x35dzhxuhorxvhhfrp/ X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Yu Kuai Currently the nasty condition is wait_barrier() is hard to read. This patch factor out the condition into a function. There are no functional changes. Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai --- drivers/md/raid10.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c index 64d6e4cd8a3a..56458a53043d 100644 --- a/drivers/md/raid10.c +++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c @@ -957,44 +957,52 @@ static void lower_barrier(struct r10conf *conf) wake_up(&conf->wait_barrier); } +static bool stop_waiting_barrier(struct r10conf *conf) +{ + /* barrier is dropped */ + if (!conf->barrier) + return true; + + /* + * If there are already pending requests (preventing the barrier from + * rising completely), and the pre-process bio queue isn't empty, then + * don't wait, as we need to empty that queue to get the nr_pending + * count down. + */ + if (atomic_read(&conf->nr_pending)) { + struct bio_list *bio_list = current->bio_list; + + if (bio_list && (!bio_list_empty(&bio_list[0]) || + !bio_list_empty(&bio_list[1]))) + return true; + } + + /* move on if recovery thread is blocked by us */ + if (conf->mddev->thread->tsk == current && + test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING, &conf->mddev->recovery) && + conf->nr_queued > 0) + return true; + + return false; +} + static bool wait_barrier(struct r10conf *conf, bool nowait) { bool ret = true; spin_lock_irq(&conf->resync_lock); if (conf->barrier) { - struct bio_list *bio_list = current->bio_list; - conf->nr_waiting++; - /* Wait for the barrier to drop. - * However if there are already pending - * requests (preventing the barrier from - * rising completely), and the - * pre-process bio queue isn't empty, - * then don't wait, as we need to empty - * that queue to get the nr_pending - * count down. - */ /* Return false when nowait flag is set */ if (nowait) { ret = false; } else { + conf->nr_waiting++; raid10_log(conf->mddev, "wait barrier"); wait_event_lock_irq(conf->wait_barrier, - !conf->barrier || - (atomic_read(&conf->nr_pending) && - bio_list && - (!bio_list_empty(&bio_list[0]) || - !bio_list_empty(&bio_list[1]))) || - /* move on if recovery thread is - * blocked by us - */ - (conf->mddev->thread->tsk == current && - test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING, - &conf->mddev->recovery) && - conf->nr_queued > 0), + stop_waiting_barrier(conf), conf->resync_lock); + conf->nr_waiting--; } - conf->nr_waiting--; if (!conf->nr_waiting) wake_up(&conf->wait_barrier); } -- 2.31.1