Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 14 Sep 2022 16:53:41 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc:     David Collins <quic_collinsd@quicinc.com>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        David Dai <daidavid1@codeaurora.org>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] spmi: pmic-arb: Add support for PMIC v7
Message-ID: <YyG5vRgsejk7Y0DH@matsya>
References: <20220201134108.2677578-1-vkoul@kernel.org>
 <YhUVAwtfjuIdKrRQ@matsya>
 <1c66890b-6736-61ef-7d16-619f90ced4a0@linaro.org>
 <4f1ae43c-0f22-19fe-0794-3cc268104396@linaro.org>
 <20220829222601.47241C433C1@smtp.kernel.org>
 <Yw2TsARPfuCLvDg0@matsya>
 <20220830211129.6D60EC433C1@smtp.kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220830211129.6D60EC433C1@smtp.kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk

On 30-08-22, 14:11, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Vinod Koul (2022-08-29 21:36:00)
> > On 29-08-22, 15:25, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2022-06-18 08:29:58)
> > > > On 01/05/2022 22:41, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > > > On 22/02/2022 19:53, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > > >> On 01-02-22, 19:11, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > > >>> Hello,
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> The is version 3 of support for PMIC v7. I have added a new property
> > > > >>> qcom,bus-id for supporting v7 and then add driver changes for v7
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> This depends on yaml conversion patch:
> > > > >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20211227170151.73116-1-david@ixit.cz/ 
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Any feedback on this...
> > > > > 
> > > > > Another gracious reminder about these patches. At this moment this is 
> > > > > one of the important pieces lacking for the full SM8450 support in the 
> > > > > upstream kernel.
> > > > 
> > > > Stephen, yet another ping. This is the blocking point for the further 
> > > > SM8450 progress.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Sorry I completely missed this one as it fell off the end of my inbox
> > > into the abyss.
> > 
> > Thanks for the reply. Is this applied now or you have some feedback for
> > me to address..
> > 
> 
> Does it apply along with the series from qcom[1]? I have to check and
> make sure they both work together.

There were conflicts, I have resolved, tested on top of spmi/next again
and posted the v4 now.. Hope this would get in.

-- 
~Vinod